For this case, the first thing you should do is take into account the irrational number definition.
An irrational number is one that can not be written as the quotient between two whole numbers.
Their number of decimals is unlimited and they are not periodic.
An irrational number within the specified domain is:
π/2 = 1.570796327
Answer:
an example of an irrational number that is less than 2 and greater than 1.5 is:
π/2 = 1.570796327
Answer:
The given equation cannot be written in slope intercept form
Step-by-step explanation:
we know that
Is the equation of the line in slope intercept form
where
m is the slope
b is the y-intercept
In this problem we have
This is a vertical line (parallel to the y-axis)
The slope is undefined
therefore
The given equation cannot be written in slope intercept form
The required proof is given in the table below:
![\begin{tabular}{|p{4cm}|p{6cm}|} Statement & Reason \\ [1ex] 1. $\overline{BD}$ bisects $\angle ABC$ & 1. Given \\ 2. \angle DBC\cong\angle ABD & 2. De(finition of angle bisector \\ 3. $\overline{AE}$||$\overline{BD}$ & 3. Given \\ 4. \angle AEB\cong\angle DBC & 4. Corresponding angles \\ 5. \angle AEB\cong\angle ABD & 5. Transitive property of equality \\ 6. \angle ABD\cong\angle BAE & 6. Alternate angles \end{tabular}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%5Cbegin%7Btabular%7D%7B%7Cp%7B4cm%7D%7Cp%7B6cm%7D%7C%7D%20%0A%20Statement%20%26%20Reason%20%5C%5C%20%5B1ex%5D%20%0A1.%20%24%5Coverline%7BBD%7D%24%20bisects%20%24%5Cangle%20ABC%24%20%26%201.%20Given%20%5C%5C%0A2.%20%5Cangle%20DBC%5Ccong%5Cangle%20ABD%20%26%202.%20De%28finition%20of%20angle%20bisector%20%5C%5C%20%0A3.%20%24%5Coverline%7BAE%7D%24%7C%7C%24%5Coverline%7BBD%7D%24%20%26%203.%20Given%20%5C%5C%20%0A4.%20%5Cangle%20AEB%5Ccong%5Cangle%20DBC%20%26%204.%20Corresponding%20angles%20%5C%5C%0A5.%20%5Cangle%20AEB%5Ccong%5Cangle%20ABD%20%26%205.%20Transitive%20property%20of%20equality%20%5C%5C%20%0A6.%20%5Cangle%20ABD%5Ccong%5Cangle%20BAE%20%26%206.%20Alternate%20angles%0A%5Cend%7Btabular%7D)
![\begin{tabular}{|p{4cm}|p{6cm}|} 7. \angle AEB\cong\angle BAE & 7. Transitive property of equality \\ 8. \overline{EB}\cong\overline{AB} & 8. From 7. $\Delta ABE$ is isosceles \\ 9. EB = AB & 9. De(finition of congruence \\ 10. $\frac{AD}{DC}=\frac{EB}{BC}$ & 10. Triangle proportionality theorem \\ 11. $\frac{AD}{DC}=\frac{AB}{BC}$ & 11. Substitution Property of equality \\[1ex] \end{tabular} ](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbegin%7Btabular%7D%7B%7Cp%7B4cm%7D%7Cp%7B6cm%7D%7C%7D%0A7.%20%5Cangle%20AEB%5Ccong%5Cangle%20BAE%20%26%207.%20Transitive%20property%20of%20equality%20%5C%5C%0A8.%20%5Coverline%7BEB%7D%5Ccong%5Coverline%7BAB%7D%20%26%208.%20From%207.%20%24%5CDelta%20ABE%24%20is%20isosceles%20%5C%5C%0A9.%20EB%20%3D%20AB%20%26%209.%20De%28finition%20of%20congruence%20%5C%5C%2010.%20%24%5Cfrac%7BAD%7D%7BDC%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7BEB%7D%7BBC%7D%24%20%26%2010.%20Triangle%20proportionality%20theorem%20%5C%5C%0A11.%20%24%5Cfrac%7BAD%7D%7BDC%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7BAB%7D%7BBC%7D%24%20%26%2011.%20Substitution%20Property%20of%20equality%20%5C%5C%5B1ex%5D%20%0A%5Cend%7Btabular%7D%0A)
Answer:
Sue would have taken 15 hours to sew all the costumes.
Step-by-step explanation:
In 10 hours, Sue sewed 5 costumes (1 every 2 hours).
Sue= 5 costumes
Sue sewed in 10 hours, twice as many costumes as Anne in 16 hours. Then 5 is twice costumes than Anne produced. Therefore, Anne sewed 2.5 costumes.
Anne: 2.5 costumes
In total they had to sew 5+2.5= 7.5 costumes. Then Sue would have taken 7.5*2= 15 hours to sew them all.
Answer:
240 grams
Step-by-step explanation:
720-480=240
