A symmetric multiprocessor organization has a number of potential advantages over a uniprocessor organization including performance, availability, incremental growth, and scaling.
A symmetric multiprocessor contains two or more identical processors that share a single main memory. Multiple processors can be separate chips or multiple cores on the same chip. Multiprocessors allow more threads to run simultaneously and certain threads to run faster. It's easy to run multiple threads concurrently.
Threads are simply split between processors. Unfortunately, the average PC user needs only a few threads running at a time. Making a particular thread run faster is much more difficult. Programmers must split existing threads into multiple threads running on each processor.
learn more about organization here: brainly.com/question/24448358
#SPJ4
Explanation:
Entrepreneurs can change the way we live and work. If successful, their revolutions may improve our standard of living. In short, in addition to creating wealth from their entrepreneurial ventures, they also create jobs and the conditions for a flourishing society.
Answer:
The Dawes Act was disastrous for Native Americans. By 1934, Indian-held land had dropped from 138 million acres to 48 million acres. Almost half of the remaining Indian-owned land was inappropriate for farming. Under the Dawes Act, individuals and families received between 80 and 320 acres for farming and ranching.
Explanation:
The correct answer of the given statement above would be FALSE. It is not true that the Northwest Ordinance made no provision for public education on the frontier. <span>The Northwest Ordinance (officially the Ordinance of 1787) was enacted by the Congress of the Confederation of the States on July 13, 1787. This statute provided for the government of the Northwest Territory, an area bounded by the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers and the Great Lakes, and created a procedure by which states could be established within this territory. Hope this is the answer helps.</span>
Answer:The Constitution does not set any qualifications for service as a Justice, thus the President may nominate any individual to serve on the Court. Senate cloture rules historically required a two-thirds affirmative vote to advance nominations to a vote; this was changed to a three-fifths supermajority in 1975.
Explanation:
