1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Luden [163]
3 years ago
14

How did the ideas of slavery begin to change around the time of the amerca revolution

History
1 answer:
Len [333]3 years ago
3 0

People thought it was hypocritical because they fought for freedom and equal rights but they had slaves.

You might be interested in
What type of songs originated with slaves doing fieldwork in the colonies
swat32
Religious or tribe songs ( cultural ) were songs sang by slaves.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE ASAP! WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST FOR CORRECT ANSWER!!!!!
DerKrebs [107]

Answer:

c

Explanation: i apologize in advance if it is not, i am good at history but learned this years ago

8 0
3 years ago
What did many free African Americans do
tester [92]
Fought in the war and became slaves I DONT KNOW IF ITS RIGHT INNOT THAT SMART JUST TO WARN YOU
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the US some people believe controls necessary while others believe gun rights should not be restricted what is the effect of
tigry1 [53]

Answer:

I mean debate can encourage new laws but if you have one side wishing for laws and the other against it. It will usually slow legislation which is entirely the purpose. But it depends on what view are you taking it from because th end result can be no legislation at all or even a relaxation of legislation in fact that's happened in some states. So it depends on the view and narrative you wish to push. because it can be a semblance of all but B. If you're a centrist you'd probably say this debate will encourage new laws but the whole point of not wishing for infringements upon one's rights means no new laws. If you wanted new laws then this debate is a waste of time but you're angering a large portion of the population because you seek not to listen to the statistics and thereby information one may have that may dissuade from the legislation. And if you look at D it can be so. If 2 cannot agree then rights will not be infringed upon. Unless the side with more representatives that disagrees with the right then such laws will be enacted. Yes, they can place new restrictions and there you can make the case it's unconstitutional and etc because well there is ground and a foundation laid upon there. But as far as an actual thing it'd be A I suppose. But I'd question the teacher because it depends on how one views a division. It can be either cooperative relationships that can be mended or an all or nothing if it's not my way then we will have conflict and it shall erupt. It all depends.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
President Polk replaced General Zachary Taylor with _________ during the war with Mexico.
podryga [215]
C.  WINFIELD SCOTT

hope this helped :)
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which choice would be considered a nation?
    7·2 answers
  • Many major religions spread throughout
    10·1 answer
  • which of the following contributed to making the discovery of new lands and new trade routes desirable
    15·1 answer
  • What characteristics define a society?
    5·1 answer
  • Splitting the power to govern between the states and a national government is known as
    8·1 answer
  • What role did women play in the war effort during world war 1
    9·2 answers
  • Theme can be defined as:
    7·1 answer
  • Who was the king of England before Elizabeth II?
    13·2 answers
  • What were some of the key features of the Northwest Ordinance of 1787?
    9·1 answer
  • What did Lester Maddox do about the civil rights act of 1964 while he was governor.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!