Answer:
1. $636
2. $674.16
3. $566.04
4. $534
Explanation:
PV = FV ÷ (1 + r/n)^(t × n)........(1)
PV = present value
FV = Future value
r = rate per period
t = number of years
n = number of compounded period per year
FV = P(1 + r/n)^(t×n)...............(2)
FV = Future value
P = principal
r = rate per period
n = number compounded period per year
t = number of year
NO 1.
P= $600
t = 1
n = 1
r = 6% = 0.06
Using equation 2
FV = 600(1 + 0.06/1)^(1 × 1) = $636
NO 2
P = $600
n = 1
t = 2
r = 0.06
Using equation 2
FV = 600(1 + 0.06/1)^(2 × 1) = $674.16
NO 3.
FV = $600
r = 0.06
t = 1
n = 1
Using equation 1
PV = 600 ÷ (1 + 0.06/1)^(1 × 1) = $566.04
NO 4.
FV = $600
r = 0.06
n = 1
t = 2
Using equation 1
PV = 600 ÷ (1 + 0.06/1)^(2 × 1) = $534
Hello <span>Wahsorad4380 </span>
Question: The bretton woods agreement incorporated all of these features except ________.<span>
Answer: floating exchange rates
Hope This Helps!
<u>-Chris</u></span>
Answer:
Letter B is correct. Brand association.
Explanation:
Brand association is a relevant marketing tool for adding value to a brand.
Marketers use resources so that there is some kind of association, value, brand awareness in the consumer's subconscious mind so that they are naturally induced to establish a preference for a particular brand. Associations are responsible for creating thoughts, opinions and actions about a brand, so marketing efforts should be related to designing a positive consumer association with the brand, which will bring added benefits of recognition, satisfaction, loyalty, price, leadership and others, which help in creating the distinctive value of a brand.
Answer:
Positive Statements: 1st & 2nd ; Normative Statements: 3rd & 4th
Explanation:
Positive Economics is <u>objective</u> & <u>facts</u> based <u>actual</u> economic issue description , explaining verifiable phenomenas (causal relationships).
Normative Economics is <u>subjective</u> & opinion based conclusive <u>solutions</u> to economic issues, including '<u>ought to be</u>' unverifiable suggestions.
1. Lung cancer kills millions of people each year: reflects actual objective verifiable fact about an economic (health) issue.
2. Too many people smoke: denotes another actual objective variable fact connected to (potential cause of) the above economic (health) issue.
So , these two are Positive Statements.
3. If the government were to increase taxes on cigarettes, fewer people would smoke : Is subjective opinion based probable solution to the above economic (health) issue.
4. The government should increase taxes on cigarettes : Is an 'ought to' suggestion for an economic participant (govt) to solve the above economic (health) issue.
So , these two are Normative Statements
Answer:
conflict of loyalty
Explanation:
In simple words, conflict of loyalty refers to a specific type of situation in which an individual faces a conflict of interest due to having loyalty towards two different parties which have different goals and objectives.
This scenario usually happens when someone in authority has to make a decision that can affect party he or she have personal relation or with the other party with with which that individual have a professional relation.
As per the modern theories, under such scenarios, individual in authority should favor professional relations over personal relations.
