1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lisa [10]
3 years ago
6

PLS HELP! it’s question 12

Mathematics
2 answers:
Andrei [34K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

yes

Step-by-step explanation:

it is going by 5s.

rusak2 [61]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Yes. This is because if you plot the numbers on a ration table or see the graph points, you can see a pattern: you multiply by 5. The equation to solve this would be y=5x. Another reason why this is proportional is that the graph starts from the origin (0,0) This is the opposite for non-proportional relationships. Hope this helps! :)

You might be interested in
(9.2 x 102) x (7.1 x 104)
gulaghasi [49]

Answer:

692914.56

Step-by-step explanation:

(9.2 x 102)

= 938.4

(7.1 x 104)

= 738.4

938.4 x 738.4

=

692914.56

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which one is the right answer ?
Darina [25.2K]

Answer:

c

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Select the correct answer from the drop-down menu.
Mice21 [21]
The rectangular prism has a volume of, 1/4 cubic meter.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How to graph y=2^x+3
Mashcka [7]

Answer:

  see below

Step-by-step explanation:

It is usually convenient to choose small exponents when graphing an exponential function. You can get a reasonable idea of the shape of the curve using x-values with a magnitude of 3 or less.

The exponential term 2^x has a horizontal asymptote of y=0 for large negative values of x. Adding 3 to that term shifts the horizontal asymptote up to y=3. Of course, everything else is shifted up the same amount.

You know that ...

  2^-1 = 1/2

  2^0 = 1

  2^1 = 2

  2^2 = 4

Adding 3 to these values will give you points on the graph for x=-1 to 2.

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following ratios are not equivalent to 7 : 3?
kenny6666 [7]
A is not equivalent to 7:3
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Leon needs to save more than $350 to buy a new bike. He has$130 saved so far, and he plans to save $20 each week until he has en
    12·2 answers
  • Just need some help with the second answer thanks :)
    9·1 answer
  • Show work if needed.please help. Only the Canadian one.
    6·1 answer
  • What is the surface area of the triangular prism?
    12·1 answer
  • Help me please and thank you
    9·1 answer
  • Sienna was dividing 12.76 by 0.001.
    10·1 answer
  • Bea can run 1/6 mile in 2 minutes. How long should it take her to run 2 miles?
    12·2 answers
  • Can i get the answers i need them or else i fail
    10·1 answer
  • I NEED URGENT HELP WITH THIS ONE
    15·1 answer
  • An art class is making a mural for their school which has a triangle drawn in the middle. The length of the bottom of the triang
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!