Answer:
Matter cannot be created nor destroyed so cycle
Explanation:
Within the Article VI, Section 3 of the United States
Constitution, we can find a clause which is called as the “No Religious Test
Clause”. By simple terms, this clause means that no federal office holder or
employee can be mandated to stick on to or believe any particular religion or
doctrine as a requirement to holding a federal office or a federal government
job.
However there are eight states which do required
officeholders to adhere even with the passage of this constitution. These
states are Texas, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Maryland, North Carolina,
Pennsylvania, South Carolina, and Tennessee. This is because these e<span>ight states include language in their
constitutions which requires state officeholders to believe in a particular
religion or specifically protecting those who do. Additionally, some of these
states have the words “so help me God” in the oath of office.</span>
Which country you are reffring to ? please elaborte
I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
To generate natural energy that's cheaper and more reliable
