Because it's less dense than liquid water.
What term applies to cases that involve disputes between two parties?
The correct answer was: a. CIVIL LAW
Answer:
A. Jack is making a(n) <u>internal attribution</u> about his girlfriend's behavior, whereas John is making a(n) <u>external attribution</u>.
Explanation:
An internal attribution refers to a situation in which <u>an individual uses a personal reason to explain the outcome of a situation</u>. For example, a specific behavior is the result of the person's personality.
On the other hand, an external attribution refers to the situation when <u>the individual attributes a result to an external situation or environmental factor</u>, not to the person's characteristics. For example, when you fail an exam and you blame an external factor, such as the teacher or the weather.
In this case, <u>Jack is making an internal attribution</u> about his girlfriend's behavior because he thinks she broke up with him because she is selfish; whereas <u>John is making an external attribution</u> because he thinks his girlfriend broke up with him because she had a family emergency to attend.
Answer: Observable recording systems
Explanation:
Observable recording systems are used to record behaviors as they are occuring. The teacher or the examiner uses this method when recording timely occasions to observe the attitude of the individual involved especially for task or an activity given for that period of time
There are at least three reasons why historians might conclude that Christianity appealed more to many Romans than the old Roman religion did. We must remember that these are ideas that historians propose and not necessarily those that religious people would accept. Actual Romans might have said they preferred Christianity because God spoke to their hearts and told them it was true. Historians have to be more cynical and look for worldly causes for religious belief.
One reason that Romans might have liked Christianity is because its god cared about people. Roman religion was based on transactions. If people performed certain actions, the gods would perform other actions in return. It was like buying something on Amazon. By contrast, in Christianity, God loves all people regardless of what they do or believe. God hopes that people will do the right thing and will punish them if they do wrong, but he loves them as individuals even when they do bad things. Historians say that Romans might have liked this idea because it fed their emotional need to feel that they were valuable and worth caring about.
A second factor in Christianity’s popularity might have been its moral code. Roman religion really did not say much if anything about how people should act in their daily lives. The gods did not care how people acted towards one another. The Christian god, on the other hand, handed down a strict set of rules about how people were to behave. This might have made people like Christianity because it made them feel that they had instructions about how to live their lives.
Finally, historians emphasize Christianity’s inclusive nature. The Roman world was very unequal. There were a few elites, a group of people who were well-off, and many, many poor people and slaves. The Roman religion did not give any of the people of the lower classes a sense that they were valuable. This is where Christianity was so different. It taught that all people are equal in the eyes of God. Historians believe that this would have made many people like the idea of Christianity because it gave them hope that god cared about them regardless of their status and that they, the “meek” would one day inherit the earth.
Historians suggest all of these as reasons why people in Roman times might have been attracted to Christianity.
