All categories

3 years ago

3- Seema has collected 46 stamps. Her mother gave her

Mathematics

1 answer:

STatiana [176]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

because if seema has 46 stamps +mother give 12 =

=46+12=58

plz mark as brainliest

You might be interested in

How do you solve this

Dmitriy789 [7]

By definition of the trig functions,

$\sin30^\circ=\dfrac y{16}$

$\cos30^\circ=\dfrac x{16}$

We have $\sin30^\circ=\dfrac12$ , so $y=8$ , and $\cos30^\circ=\dfrac{\sqrt3}2$ , so $x=8\sqrt3$ .

Just to check: we should have

$x^2+y^2=16^2$

by the Pythagorean theorem. Indeed,

$8^2+(8\sqrt3)^2=4\cdot8^2=2^2(2^3)^2=2^8=(2^4)^2=16^2$

6 0

4 years ago

Tain has a great literary tradition that spans centuries. One might assume, then, that Britons read more than citizens of other

tresset_1 [31]

Answer:

Null hypothesis: $p_{1} \leq p_{2}$

Alternative hypothesis: $p_{1} > p_{2}$

$z=3.02$

$p_v =P(Z>3.02)=0.00127$

The p value is a very low value and using any significance level for example $\alpha=0.05, 0,1,0.15$ always $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say the the proportion of Canadians is not significantly higher than the porportions of readers at Britons.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Data given and notation

$X_{1}=0.86*1004$ represent the number of Canadians randomly sampled by Gallup that read at least one book in the past year

$X_{2}=0.81*1009$ represent the number of Britons randomly sampled that read at least one book in the past year

$n_{1}=1004$ sample of Gallup selected

$n_{2}=1009$ sample of Britons selected

$p_{1}=0.86$ represent the proportion of Canadians randomly sampled by Gallup that read at least one book in the past year

$p_{2}=0.81$ represent the proportion of Britons randomly sampled that read at least one book in the past year

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the value for the test (variable of interest)

2) Concepts and formulas to use

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the proportion for men with red/green color blindness is a higher than the rate for women , the system of hypothesis would be:

Null hypothesis: $p_{1} \leq p_{2}$

Alternative hypothesis: $p_{1} > p_{2}$

We need to apply a z test to compare proportions, and the statistic is given by:

$z=\frac{p_{1}-p_{2}}{\sqrt{\hat p (1-\hat p)(\frac{1}{n_{1}}+\frac{1}{n_{2}})}}$ (1)

Where $\hat p=\frac{X_{1}+X_{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}}=\frac{0.81+0.86}{2}=0.835$

3) Calculate the statistic

Replacing in formula (1) the values obtained we got this:

$z=\frac{0.86-0.81}{\sqrt{0.835(1-0.835)(\frac{1}{1004}+\frac{1}{1009})}}=3.02$

4) Statistical decision

For this case we don't have a significance level provided $\alpha$ , but we can calculate the p value for this test.

Since is a one side test the p value would be:

$p_v =P(Z>3.02)=0.00127$

So the p value is a very low value and using any significance level for example $\alpha=0.05, 0,1,0.15$ always $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say the the proportion of Canadians is not significantly higher than the porportions of readers at Britons.

5 0

4 years ago

You are Looking at two area rugs for your bedroom. One is a square with a side length of 6.3 feet the other is rectangle that is

Ray Of Light [21]

Answer:

Part a) The square rug cover the greater area

Part b) The square rug cover 0.33 square feet more than the rectangular rug

Step-by-step explanation:

step 1

Find the area of the square rug

The area of a square is

$A=b^2$