Answer:
C. It was a compromise between big and small states so that states with a larger population cannot control presidential elections
Explanation:
Durign its earlier creation, small states believed that there is no point for them to be uniting under one federal government. This perception was created because they typically have lower population compared to the bigger states.
Meaning that if smaller states and bigger states conduct a vote to elect a government that rule all of them, smaller states will always lose if the result is determined by simple majority.
As a compromise, electoral college was created. Rather than basing the total number of votes based on the number of population, The election in the electoral college is based on the amount of people that each state has within the The Senate and House of Representatives.
This provide an opportunity for smaller states to over the big states during the general election.
d. conscripted through the devshirme to serve the provincial governors.
Explanation:
- As far as is known from historical documents, the Janissaries units were units filled not only with Christian children but also with Muslim ones.
- In the beginning of their era, that army was filled with Christian boys by two-thirds, and one-third by children of poor Muslims.
- In the last centuries, the existence of the Janissaries was abolished.
Learn more on Ottoman Empire on
brainly.com/question/8047271
brainly.com/question/382168
#learnwithBrainly
Answer:
That statement is false.
Explanation:
Stephen F. Austin was thrown to prison on the basis of Treason. He tried to fought for the right of Texan colonists regardless of The order from the Mexican government.
But, he did not spent 3 years in prison.
He was only confined in there for around 8 months before eventual being returned to Texas.
<span>The right answer is "Role performance does not always match role expectation". <span>Generally,
different abilities are attributed to each gender, considering that the
opposite gender is deficient in that ability, however, this is usually
more a stereotype linked to the role of the gender that has something
real.</span></span>
Answer:
Some members could be alarmed but it doesn't necessarily mean that Community Hospital has lower-quality care than Middle Hospital and University Hospital. It is important to identify that this alarm could also come from the increased economic pressure on hospitals.
R.W. Dubois, R.H. Brook and W.H. Rogers (1987) have studied the death rate index as a potential screen for quality of medical care since the 80s. In their article, they state that hospital with higher death rates "may provide inadequate quality of care or have uniquely ills patient populations." This would lead the Quality Task Force to explore and define the ills patient population of the Community Hospital.
Mary E.Goss and Joseph I. Reed (1974) explore the quality evaluating practices of hospital care through severity-adjusted death rates in the 70s. Their analysis suggested that differences in technological adequacy, control status and teaching status of the hospitals partially support the validity of death rate as a quality index; but "the index is too dependent of the local population".
Therefore a population characterization must be necessary to bring up in this discussion as a cohort study. Goss and Reed also stated that the death rate "may be more productive in the long run". This means that the death rate would be better estimated in a longitudinal study as a quality care index.
References:
Dubois, R. W., Brook, R. H., & Rogers, W. H. (1987). Adjusted hospital death rates: a potential screen for quality of medical care. American journal of public health, 77(9), 1162–1166. doi:10.2105/ajph.77.9.1162
Mary E. W. Goss and Joseph I. Reed, Medical Care, Vol. 12, No. 3 (Mar., 1974), pp. 202-213