It would be -3. since they’re different signs you would subtract instead of doing addition. you also would us the greater numbers sign, which, in this case, -9 is the greater number so the answers sign would be negative.
Answer: my bad 324,000 isnt the answer. Its 325,000
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
EG = 2 units
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that line q bisects EG at T , then
ET = TG ( substitute values )
x = x - 2 ( multiply through by 3 to clear the fraction )
x = 3x - 6 ( subtract x from both sides )
0 = 2x - 6 ( add 6 to both sides )
6 = 2x ( divide both sides by 2 )
3 = x
Then
ET = x = × 3 = 1
TG = x - 2 = 3 - 2 = 1
Thus
EG = ET + TG = 1 + 1 = 2 units
Set the whole expression = to 0 and solve for x.
3x^(5/3) - 4x^(7/3) = 0. Factor out x^(5/3): x^(5/3) [3 - 4x^(2/3)] = 0
Then either x^(5/3) = 0, or 3 - 4x^(2/3) = 0.
In the latter case, 4x^(2/3) = 3.
To solve this: mult. both sides by x^(-2/3). Then we have
4x^(2/3)x^(-2/3) = 3x^(-2/3), or 4 = 3x^(-2/3). It'd be easier to work with this if we rewrote it as
4 3
--- = --------------------
1 x^(+2/3)
Then
4
--- = x^(-2/3). Then, x^(2/3) = (3/4), and x = (3/4)^(3/2). According to my 3 calculator, that comes out to x = 0.65 (approx.)
Check this result! subst. 0.65 for x in the given equation. Is the equation then true?
My method here was a bit roundabout, and longer than it should have been. Can you think of a more elegant (and shorter) solution?
Answer:
Should be 2, -5
Step-by-step explanation:
you flip –2, 5 along y axis, then get 2, 5
then flip 2, 5 along x axis and get 2, -5
feel free to correct
