Two things that INCREASE population, would be an increase in leisure space. Another is if the area is sustainable for life. Two things that would DECREASE population, would be a scarcity of any required resources. A decrease in space, and not a sustainable area.
Answer:
O and Q
Explanation:
Why O: Because gas has a lot of energy and movement and doesn't have a definite shape or volume, it can move as much as it likes, but when it condenses, it becomes a liquid, and a liquid has a definite volume, but no definite shape, and has less energy and movement.
Why Q: Because liquid has a definite volume, but no definite shape, and a good amount of energy and movement, but when it freezes it loses its energy and movement, and becomes a solid, and a solid has a definite volume and shape and the particles can barely move enough to vibrate
I hope you at least understand my concept. :)
Many owls eat small rodents and similar critters. So let's say the rabbit population might grow if owls weren't there to keep the numbers down.
<span>Foxes probably eat the same sort of small rodents. So if owls weren't there, foxes would have more food to themselves, so their population might go up. </span>
<span>And if foxes had more small rodents to eat, they would eat relatively less of any one species. So if they had plenty of rabbits to eat, they might eat less squirrels, so the squirrel population would go up.</span>
It is the process of muscle contraction involving the sliding of actin & myosin myofilaments past each other to shorten the length of each sacromere.
