Answer:
No, because the limitation was not communicated to her.
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that this is not true because the limitation was not communicated to her. Since she walked into a store and asked to have her dress cleaned, the individual at the front desk should have explicitly mentioned the pricing and policy to her so that she knew what she was accepting by leaving her dress at the store. Since they did not do this then they must pay her the $300 that the dress is worth.
He was suspected of being a soviet spy
I pretty sure it's isthmus
The correct answer is The couple moves out to a non-community property state.
Explanation: Among these options this would be the only one that would result in an end of status, as they would be moving to another community where the system is not the same as it is now.
