The early phase of the civilization lasted from circa 3300 BC until 2800 BC. This saw farming settlements grow into large and sophisticated urban centres.
The quality of municipal town planning indicates that these communities were controlled by efficient governments. These clearly placed a high priority on accessibility to water. Modern scholars tend to see in this the influence of a religion which places a string emphasis on ritual washing - much like modern Hinduism.
Hygiene was also important to the inhabitants. The urban planning included the world's first known urban sanitation systems. Within the city, people obtained water from wells. Within their homes, some rooms had facilities in which waste water was directed to covered drains. These lined the major streets. These ancient Indus sewerage and drainage systems were far in advance of anything found in contemporary urban sites in the Middle East.
The advanced architecture and construction techniques of the Indus cities is shown by their impressive dockyards, granaries, warehouses, brick platforms, and protective walls. Their massive walls were probably designed to protect them as much from floods as from attack.
Most city dwellers were traders or artisans. They lived with others of the same occupation in well-defined neighbourhoods. Although some houses were larger than others, Indus civilization cities do not show the kind of massive gulf between wealthy and poor dwellings that is found in those of other civilizations. Their society seems to have been egalitarian to a remarkable degree - but perhaps we should not make too much of this until the civilization in understood more, as this seems to contradict so much of what we know about other ancient societies. However, all the houses had access to water and drainage facilities, which gives the impression of a society where even the poor had a decent standard of living (though there may have been extensive "shanty towns" outside the walls, which have left scant archaeological remains).
http://www.timemaps.com/civilization/Indus-Valley-civilization<span> :) All that info will Help u</span>
Constantinople since it is the heart of the empire.
If the British economy is struggling, fewer tourists might visit Kenya.
Explanation:
Great Britain and Kenya are two countries that are on the opposite sides of the economic spectrum. The British have strong, well, developed, highly industrialized economy, being one of the most developed countries in the world. Kenya is a country that only recently started to move in the right direction. It is a developing country, and gradually it is moving forward, but is still way behind the level of the developed countries.
Despite these two countries not sharing a border, and being on different continents, they can have influence on each other when it comes to the economy. For example, Kenya is a country that focuses a lot of tourism, especially safari tourism. This type of tourism is mostly practiced by people from the developed countries, such as Great Britain. If the British economy starts to slow down, and it struggles, the people will lose their economic power, and will be less willing to spend on tourism. This will result in a decrease of tourist in Kenya, and with the tourism being such an important branch in its economy, it can be a big blow.
Learn more about developing countries brainly.com/question/1616250
#learnwithBrainly
Answer:
Marcus Garvey was an orator for the Black Nationalism and Pan-Africanism movements, to which end he founded the Universal Negro Improvement Association and African Communities League. Garvey advanced a Pan-African philosophy which inspired a global mass movement, known as Garveyism.
Explanation:
Still the basic economic superiority of the camel prevailed. A few wagons reappeared under the Turks. More significantly, the Ottoman Turkish expansion into the Balkans did not spell the end of wheeled transport there. However, in general the use of the camel remained all-pervasive until the advent of European influence which stimulated the building of carriages for use in cities.
Then came the automobile and the end of the contest was in sight. There were setbacks, of course. In World War II, for example, lack of tires often forced the Arabian American Oil Company (Aramco) to use camels instead of trucks. But that was temporary. Today even Bedouins keep a truck parked outside their tents. The day of the camel is past, and whoever laments its passing would do well to remember that 2,000 years ago someone else was lamenting the passing of the ox cart.
YES, IT DID
