1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aleksklad [387]
2 years ago
9

What famous or notable people were in the audience?

History
1 answer:
maksim [4K]2 years ago
4 0

In what audience specifically?

You might be interested in
Who benefits from the 14th amendment?
liraira [26]

Citizens that have been naturalized or are born in the US/former slaves at the time.

It granted equal protection of the law

6 0
3 years ago
Of the following men, which one believed that sovereign powers reside with the citizens and the government gets its authority fr
andrew11 [14]
It would be "Jean-Jacques Rousseau" who believed that sovereign powers reside with the citizens and the government gets its authority from the consent of the <span>governed, since he was a major Enlightenment thinker. Paine also believed this, however. </span>
7 0
3 years ago
Write a 500 word essay answering the following questions.
german

Answer:

The Warren Court made decisions regarding segregation and civil liberties. The most famous court decision was Brown v. Board of Education which ended school segregation in America and began a wave of desegregation decisions. These decisions created uproar in the South and cause military intervention at times. Miranda v. Arizona was another famous Warren Court decision which better defined the Fifth Amendment and how a person must be informed on their rights when arrested. These cases were often racial in nature redefining civil liberties and due process of the law.Yes the Warren Court did exceed its boundaries in issuing some of its decisions during the 1960s. For example the court gave its decision regarding women suffrage and it was not taken well by many women of that time. Many women were forced to suffer the consequences of the decision given by the Warren Court in regards to women's suffrage.The Tonkin Gulf Resolution was a joint resolution which the United States Congress passed on August 7, 1964. It gave power to the president to use conventional military force without declaration of war. It basically gave more power to the president then checks and balances allow. In this case for the given question let us assume that it was the executive branch that had taken fore step and became more powerful. If such had happened the power resting upon the head of the society or the president would increase and the chances of being mistake in due to the presence of human emotions and flaws would come into action.  The decisions taken by the agencies would be biased and hence the laws that would be made would not necessarily benefits the society. When the US Constitution was written, the States feared a strong Federal Government. Because of the three branches system the US Constitution created a new system that revolutionized Constitutions around the world: the Checks and Balances system.  The Checks and Balances system is a system that the US Constitution created to give powers to each of those three branches to limit the power of the other branch. Each branch has typical and atypical powers, and those atypical powers are the ones that are used to limit the typical powers of other branches.  Because of that, if any of the three branches exceeds its authority the other branches have the power to stop this power and return the thing to status quo ante.  Example of this atypical powers is: The Power of Veto the President has, the Impeachment Power of the Congress and Power the judicial branch has to declare a law unconstitutional.  As you can notice, the Constitution created a system that autoregulates itself so that power and democracy are stable. The Warren Court has caused social change but one thing that the warren court has impacted positivily is that it broadened the individual rights of accused criminals. yes there is ups and downs to the warren court and it was a big thing in the 19th century but remembering on how of a impact it was has gave us importance today because any case that had segregation and enough evidence was presented, then a law for segregation would be unconstitutional.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
NEED A S A P!! I'LL GIVE EXTRA POINTS
melamori03 [73]
The economic advantages of the physical geography of the U.S. is the easy access to water/water ways, as well as the wide arrange of environments.

The U.S. gained island ports that were stopping points between trading routes. <span />
6 0
3 years ago
What is the connection between the policy of laissez faire and natural economic laws?
Nutka1998 [239]
The government does not intervene in either the policy of laissez faire or natural economic laws, and economics are left to take their natural course. 
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the name of the bomber plane created by the United States for World War 2
    14·1 answer
  • How did war world 2 impact america economically?
    13·1 answer
  • Dynasty that ended the period of political chaos after fall of qin-han?
    8·1 answer
  • Most of the state constitution of 1910 remains in effect today
    11·1 answer
  • What is the Hellenistic Empire? How did it get its name?​
    7·1 answer
  • This is a techincal term for the type of slavery in which people are treated as property are routinely bought and sold and are c
    14·1 answer
  • How do our belief influence our behavior ?
    11·2 answers
  • Identify the leader of Italy, which joined forces with Hitler.<br> ( I need a small paragraph)
    15·2 answers
  • Which event marked the beginning of segregation in professional baseball in the late 1800s? Congress passed a law segregating al
    13·2 answers
  • Why did the gold–salt trade have an enormous impact on the cultures of West Africa?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!