1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
JulsSmile [24]
2 years ago
11

What is an argument of Americans who support increased immigration?

History
1 answer:
PilotLPTM [1.2K]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Immigrants support U.S. economic growth as consumers.

Explanation:

What is an argument of Americans who support increased immigration?

If they support the immigration than they will argue that "Immigrants support U.S. economic growth as consumers."

You might be interested in
Express the product of 2x^2+6x-8 and x+3 in standard form
topjm [15]
The answer is 2x^2 - 2x + 3
3 0
3 years ago
What stayed the same during reconstruction era and what changed ?
In-s [12.5K]

Answer:

Explanation: The period of reconstruction in American history occurred after the American Civil War. During those 12 years, the government sought to address the country's accumulated problems that arose as a war product. Also, one of the elementary details of the reconstruction period is an effort to resolve slavery in the country. The Reconstruction period also represents a change in the elements of the American constitution, primarily involving the inclusion of new laws that were supposed to guarantee the civil rights of African Americans and Africans in the country. In this context, it is important to mention Amendment 13 of the United States Constitution, which abolishes slavery.

The Reconstruction period included the inclusion of the Confederation in the union and the regulation of all economic and political problems. The issue of economics was also one of the main problems. Namely, in the war, the south of the country was destroyed, and the cotton plantations where slaves used to work remained empty. So the economic problems were obvious. The south of the country, therefore, needed to be involved in industrial flows.

5 0
2 years ago
Shortly after arriving in Europe, which of the following actions were American troops able to do?
forsale [732]
Shortly after arriving in Europe American troops were able to push to the south and east for the first time while Russian forces moved in from the East. 
8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was a motive for European exploration between 1400 and 1800?
Lapatulllka [165]
The correct answer is C. the wealth that could be made through trade.
A is incorrect because the Mongol Empire practically stopped existing in the 14th century. B is incorrect because Christianity was the biggest religion at the time. D is incorrect because they had many cures for these diseases. Thus, this leaves us with C as the correct answer, which is true - they went to Asia and the Americas in search of wealth and trade.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write a 500 word essay answering the following questions.
german

Answer:

The Warren Court made decisions regarding segregation and civil liberties. The most famous court decision was Brown v. Board of Education which ended school segregation in America and began a wave of desegregation decisions. These decisions created uproar in the South and cause military intervention at times. Miranda v. Arizona was another famous Warren Court decision which better defined the Fifth Amendment and how a person must be informed on their rights when arrested. These cases were often racial in nature redefining civil liberties and due process of the law.Yes the Warren Court did exceed its boundaries in issuing some of its decisions during the 1960s. For example the court gave its decision regarding women suffrage and it was not taken well by many women of that time. Many women were forced to suffer the consequences of the decision given by the Warren Court in regards to women's suffrage.The Tonkin Gulf Resolution was a joint resolution which the United States Congress passed on August 7, 1964. It gave power to the president to use conventional military force without declaration of war. It basically gave more power to the president then checks and balances allow. In this case for the given question let us assume that it was the executive branch that had taken fore step and became more powerful. If such had happened the power resting upon the head of the society or the president would increase and the chances of being mistake in due to the presence of human emotions and flaws would come into action.  The decisions taken by the agencies would be biased and hence the laws that would be made would not necessarily benefits the society. When the US Constitution was written, the States feared a strong Federal Government. Because of the three branches system the US Constitution created a new system that revolutionized Constitutions around the world: the Checks and Balances system.  The Checks and Balances system is a system that the US Constitution created to give powers to each of those three branches to limit the power of the other branch. Each branch has typical and atypical powers, and those atypical powers are the ones that are used to limit the typical powers of other branches.  Because of that, if any of the three branches exceeds its authority the other branches have the power to stop this power and return the thing to status quo ante.  Example of this atypical powers is: The Power of Veto the President has, the Impeachment Power of the Congress and Power the judicial branch has to declare a law unconstitutional.  As you can notice, the Constitution created a system that autoregulates itself so that power and democracy are stable. The Warren Court has caused social change but one thing that the warren court has impacted positivily is that it broadened the individual rights of accused criminals. yes there is ups and downs to the warren court and it was a big thing in the 19th century but remembering on how of a impact it was has gave us importance today because any case that had segregation and enough evidence was presented, then a law for segregation would be unconstitutional.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Members of the Immigration Restoration League wanted to
    13·1 answer
  • Which group of people were not imprisoned in concentration camps
    8·1 answer
  • How would political maps of the Middle East in 1945 and 1950 be different?
    8·2 answers
  • What new concept became popular with department stores?
    9·1 answer
  • Which is the best explanation for the fall of the Aztec Empire?
    10·2 answers
  • Explain the difference between the prosecutor in a criminal case and the prosecutor in a civil case.
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of a want versus need
    15·1 answer
  • What was one reason people may not have believed what Jesus taught?
    6·1 answer
  • Why did Dr K.I. Singh revolt?
    9·2 answers
  • In McCulloch v. MarylaIn Gibbons v. Ogden, the Supreme Court ruled that
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!