<span>The y-intercept of is .
Of course, it is 3 less than , the y-intercept of .
Subtracting 3 does not change either the regions where the graph is increasing and decreasing, or the end behavior. It just translates the graph 3 units down.
It does not matter is the function is odd or even.
is the mirror image of stretched along the y-direction.
The y-intercept, the value of for , is</span><span>which is times the y-intercept of .</span><span>Because of the negative factor/mirror-like graph, the intervals where increases are the intervals where decreases, and vice versa.
The end behavior is similarly reversed.
If then .
If then .
If then .
The same goes for the other end, as tends to .
All of the above applies equally to any function, polynomial or not, odd, even, or neither odd not even.
Of course, if polynomial functions are understood to have a non-zero degree, never happens for a polynomial function.</span><span> </span>
Answer:
24
Step-by-step explanation:
f(x)=x^2+2x
Let x= 4
f(4)=4^2+2*4
= 16 + 8
= 24
Sum = n/2[2a + (n - 1)d] where a = first term, n = number of terms and d = common difference
(a) 30/2(2 x 5 + (30 - 1) x d) = 1455
10 + 29d = 1455 / 15
29d = 97 - 10
d = 87 / 29 = 3
(b) 7/2(2 x 9 + (7 - 1)d) = 0
18 + 6d = 0
6d = -18
d = -3
The value of y from the diagram is 9
<h3>Similar shapes</h3>
From the given figure, the shapes are similar, using the similarity theorem of triangles, you ill have;
6/10 = y/15
Cross multiply
10y = 15* 10
10y = 90
y = 90/10
y = 9
Hence the value of y from the diagram is 9
Learn more on similar shapes here: brainly.com/question/2644832
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The description is too ambiguous to reconstruct the diagram. You need to post the actual diagram.
That diagram is just one way to view division by a fraction. An easier way: DIVIDING by a fraction is the same as MULTIPLYING by the upside-down fraction. For example,
(1/2) ÷ (1/4) = (1/2) × (4/1) = 2
That doesn’t help you answer this particular question, though.
