The correct answer to this situation is the following.
Well, here we are facing an ethical dilemma. Alex thought that she "played her cards" optimally and benefited from the situation. The companies acted in "goodwill" and pay as promised all the expenses when they both sent the checks a weel later. But that is not the kind of conduct that is expected from an ethical professional. She is cheating in order to get money from the companies.
What she should have done is be honest and candidly express the real situation. That should have shown that she is a person of high values that respects the hard-earned money of the company and that she always acts with class, being honest and open.
Answer:
Risk avoider
Explanation:
Answer to the following question is risk avoider;
A risk avoider is someone who makes decisions because they are afraid to make mistakes. A risk avoider is a person who exclusively examines options that do not contain any hazards. A risk avoider avoids making actions that might result in a disastrous outcome.
Answer:
B) Decentralization of authority
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described it can be said that the concept that is best illustrated in this scenario would be a decentralization of authority. This is the process in which authority is moved to the lower level managers within an organization. Which is what is happening in Chimbake, since they have given the store managers full authority to control and create the dessert flavors as they see fit.
The amount of discount that the customer incurred by paying the amount due on time is calculated by multiplying the discount rate with the given value. This is calculated as below.
(0.02)(1197) = 23.94
Hence, the amount of discount calculated and recorded is equivalent to 23.94.
Answer:
it would take 30 weeks if you got paid 200$
Explanation: