Answer: B.) The return of Mexican lands held by the United States.
Explanation:
Answer:
Caliphs and the Ummayad Caliphate.
Explanation:
Answer:
The holy places they desecrate and destroy in numberless ways . . .lest you should lose the kingdom of the Christians
Explanation:
<span>The american electorate began seriously to question the competence of the bush administration as a result of
mismanagement </span>
of the government's response to Hurricane Katrina.
Hurricane Katrina hit
the Gulf Coast on August 29, 2005 with sustained winds of 125 mph. It damaged
an estimated $100 B in properties and approximately 1000 people lost their
lives.
Hurricane Katrina badly blemished George W. Bush's reputation.
His administration failed to timely and efficiently deal with the calamity.
<span />
It's clear that one of the systems does not work. Corruption and failure are not strangers to either system, but one of them has a higher success rate to prove its point.
The first argument is pretty simple. Socialism has never worked. From that view, it is pretty clear that empirical evidence suggests that socialism usually ends up turning into an oppressive pseudo capitalist corporatism, as it has happened in South America repeatedly, or it will become a dictatorship, as it has happened in South America, Africa and even to Russia and its neighbor countries.
Socialism, to work, has to have state force using firearms to impose their will upon the others. It smashes the will and freedom of minorities, and by minorities I mean anyone who disagrees with them, and forces them, with the raw and physical power of the State, to behave accordingly.
Capitalism, though, is all about competition and voluntarism when it is not infected with the corrupted politicians that ally themselves with big companies, making an ugly son that we call corporatism. But even when that is the case, people tend to have something to eat, that can't be said about current Venezuela and North Korea.