Answer:
The right answer is Nikita Khrushchev.
Explanation:
After Joseph Stalin´death and the internal power fight that followed it, politburo member Nikita Khrushchev emerged as the new secretary-general of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union in 1953. In February 1956, he delivered a famous close-door-session speech to the 20th party congress that sent shock waves to the whole communist world. In the speech, Krushchev critized Stalin and his ruling style, the purges of innocent comrades and people and many mistakes he had made.
Answer:
I don't know...call me crazy, but I don't think this would be such a bad idea (at least sometime in the future.) With the advent of the internet, there really is no reason why people can't have more input on legislation. Remember, congressmen act as representatives of the people for logistical reasons. Were voting allowed via internet, mail, or permanent polling places, the logistical roadblocks are reduced.
This country has an annoying quality where senators and representatives are elected and then inject their own personality into their voting. They are supposed to represent the people of their district. If 60% of the people in their district feel a certain way about an issue, why is the congressman/woman allowed to vote a different way? Why do their personal beliefs really matter at all? They are supposed to be voting the way their district wants regardless of what they personally believe.
I know, I know, things can be horribly complicated and the average person can't possibly understand all the issues they are voting on, but last I checked their is no intelligence requirement to be in the government...many people in governement now are dumb as a box of rocks. They don't have to be smart to be elected, they have to be personable and have good advisors working in the background.
Imagine being able to directly vote on education issues, warfare issues, and being able to prioritize budget items. Instead of blaming the morons in congress we would only be able to blame ourselves when things went horribly wrong. Of course, some form of standing governement would still be needed for a lot of reasons.
Again, I know the technology is not hot enough right now to provide the secruity that would be needed, etc, but it won't be long...
The correct answer is The US Constitution because of the Supremacy Clause
The Supremacy Clause makes it clear that on matters within the Federal purview, the US Constitution is the Supreme law of the land.
If Ohio and the US are fighting over a State issue, it will likely go to Court and the State will be allowed to continue.
Answer:A. Department of Justice.
Explanation:
An executive department whose main function is to promote safety is the
A. Department of Justice.
B. the Department of the Treasury.
C. the Department of Commerce.
D. the Department of the Interior.
Explanation:
The Department of Justice's has a mission of to enforcing the laws of the United States. Laws are the ultimate way to ensure safety for all citizens . Thus, the correct answer is the Department of Justice.
The Department of Justice also oversees the FBI (Federal burueau of investigation )and other organizations like the DEA( Drug Enforcement Administration)and ATF (Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms)who work to make America safer.
