Answer: Yes
Explanation:
If the difference in average spending amounts between the two groups is determined to be statistically significant, it would be legitimate to draw such a conclusion.
Why?
Those who were told that it was a Tuition rebate, a reward of sorts, had spent on average, $22.04 whilst those who thought it was simply bonus income had spent significantly less at $9.55.
This means that indeed there is a CAUSE and EFFECT conclusion to be drawn between what the money was called and how much was spent because it is clear that when called a tuition rebate, more of it is spent as opposed to it being called a Bonus income.
7. Option b. Consideration is mutual i.e. both parties get something in the return for the performance of the contract. However, Esmeralda has not given consideration in exchange.
Esmeralda was given the chance to audition for the Performing Arts High School which she succeeded in. She then moved to New York and attended School, studying drama and dance.
Esmeralda Santiago wrote her autobiography "When I Was Puerto Rican" which narrates her and her family's life moving from Puerto Rico to America. The book also follows the Puerto Rican girl through the many obstacles that she had to endure and overcome to change her life.
Learn more Esmeralda at
brainly.com/question/24812570
#SPJ1
I'm pretty sure the answer is c problem solving
Merry Christmas!!
Answer:
Given that,
sold a paging system = $4,500
Sold extended warranty = $1,400
The journal entry to record this transaction would include:
(i) cash account Dr. $4,500
To Sales A/c $4,500
(To record the sales)
(ii) Cash A/c Dr. $1,400
To Unearned revenue A/c $1,400
(To record the service revenue)
Answer:
Public disclosure test
Explanation:
The public disclosure test refers to the fact that companies have to care about what the public thinks about them. Before people used to say that the public disclosure test was like having your life broadcasted by television; Are we acting properly? What would happen if our actions were made public?
Nowadays the public disclosure test is much more common because everyone has and uses a smartphone. Everything is public now, a video showing a truck illegal disposing hazardous waste material would go viral in minutes and the company's reputation would be destroyed.
