2,3,5,6 i believe is the answer
Jeff accidentally insulted the parents of his roommate Mohammed by putting his feet up on the desk when they were visiting their dorm room. Jeff's behavior illustrates that communication can be Unintentional.
<h3>What is Unintentional Communication?</h3>
- Meanings that are "given off" (to use Goffman's terminology) by a person's body language through nonverbal leakage or unintentionally conveyed through their look, dress, or behavior, including anything that would be discernible by its absence in a given situation (see also analogic communication).
- Intentional verbal messages are our deliberate attempts to interact with people through speech. Things we speak without intention are known as unintentional verbal communications. One is subconsciously driven when he conveys any accidental cues, both vocal and nonverbal.
- Crossing your arms in front of you is an illustration of inadvertent communication. This is a nonverbal way of interrupting a conversation and letting the other person know that one is not interested in what they have to say.
To learn more about Communication refer to:
brainly.com/question/13008699
#SPJ4
It was selling goods to the French and the English by this way United Nations was profited
Explanation:
It was the time when the French and the Britishers started establishing their colonies all over the world. They fought wars to win over the countries for that they needed a neutral country support so it was the United Nations who extended to offer goods and services to both the nations so and to both the countries. United Nations did not support any of the countries it just remained neutral between the two.
Townshend Acts because the Townshend Acts placed an indirect tax on glass, lead, paints, paper, and tea. These goods were not produced within the colonies and had to be imported from Britain.
Answer:
The answer is theodicy.
Explanation:
Theodicy refers to a branch of philosophy that questions the existence of evil in the presence of an all-powerful God.
Many philosopher's along history have dealt with this problem, and one of the first to do so was Epicurus, who claimed that a God that could but didn't want to stop evil shouldn't even be called a God.
