1)They are very reliable because they are almost always accurate.All science in the courtroom has to be verified in order to be used in the court to prove that their tests are accurate and reliable and can be used as an evidence in court. Reliability is measured by how much your machines have been validated ,if a forensic scientist in a court say the evidence is true but did not have a proper reliability , than people can question how true this test can actually be. Hard science is consisted of chemistry,biology and physics are the most reliable evidence.
2)The reliability of the analytical science in the courtroom is growing. This is because of the fact that analytical science involves comparison between the characteristics and features of the suspected specimens with those obtained from the criminals or victims. The analytical science plays an important role in proving a fact that a crime has been committed, the place of crime and establishing the identity of the culprit.
HOPE THIS HELPS..
Answer:
There are many answers so ima give one, We can listen and understand the candidates objective by looking at there past, Most would have done charity or giving to people in need. When they were younger they weren't as fortunate and lived like the majority before they became a candidate. This may show if they are trust worthy enough to represent the majority because they understand what its like for people in need.
Explanation:
Just write your own essay and then use quilbot
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The given statement is false.
The reason for the the statement to be false is that the 22nd amendment states that no Person can be elected as the president of the country more than once also the person cannot contest as a President even if the person holds or acted as the president for more than two years in his entire lifetime.
