Answer:
sorry, cant speak chinese still the answer is B
Explanation:
21 - 1 = 20
I believe the answer is A, ( because the word “globalization” means spreading something on an international scale ) but if not feel free to tell me so !
We sincerely apologise to the customer's that have fallen ill from our food we have thoroughly gone through our ingredients and have located what has made people sick. We have taken that ingredient out of our product. We also have taken precautions to make sure we have safe ingredients.
The Innocence Project aims to release the innocent, avert false accusations, and develop just, sympathetic, and equitable justice systems for all.
<h3>The Innocence Project provides what evidence of innocence?</h3>
The Innocence Project represents clients who want DNA testing after a conviction to establish their innocence. We also offer advice in a number of appeals instances where the defendant is being represented by principal counsel, as well as background knowledge on DNA testing litigation.
<h3>What kind of cases deals with the Innocence Project?</h3>
Sexual assaults, killings, assaults involving close physical contact or a struggle, and some robberies are examples of crimes where tangible evidence was gathered that was worn by or in contact with the actual perpetrator. The accused must have received a conviction.
To know more about Innocence Project visit:-
brainly.com/question/16239980
#SPJ4
Answer:
The events involved symbolic speech without disruption.
Explanation:
Tinker v. Des Moines was a suite filed against a district school in 1965. The case was on a public district school in lowa who suspended three students who were protesting for the Vietnam War by wearing black armband in the school. The armband that they were wearning were a devise of symbolic speech. Such protest and speech rights for students is protected under the First Amendment.
The students were protesting the war in Vietnam for bringing back the soldiers back home. The school suspended three students, who denied to remove the armband, and against this, their parents filed litigationagainst the school.
When in 1969, the case entered the Supreme Court, it ruled the suit in students' favor stating that their protest involved symbolic speech, which is protected under the First Amendment, and because their protest using symbolic speech was not bringing disruption.
So, option first is correct.
