Answer:
The pronoun "it" is wrong because the word "domes" is plural and "it" is singular. You would replace it with "they".
Answer:
You need to explain the five sensors of the phrase surrounded in speech marks.
Explanation:
The five sensors are sight, sound, taste, touch and smell.
So for example, you could write:
Sight : "I could see him hold his gun, his fingers ready to pull the trigger."
Sound: "I could hear Johnny reloading his gun."
Taste: "I could taste the metallic smell of the bullet as it made its way, destroying walls and leaving a perfect sphere-like mark."
Touch: "I held the gun. It was heavy, metallic and quite firm." < This is in Johnny's perspective.
Smell: "Johnny had pulled the trigger. Smoke had made its way into the air, as it slowly disappears, releasing a painful smell to my nostrils."
I apologise if this wasn't the help you were looking for. But it was worth a shot. I hope this helped.
Stay safe!
(Please mark this as brainliest if it did help!)
Based on the question, the adverb there is <u>quite</u>. Its kind is adverb of <u>degree</u>.
<h3>Adverbs</h3>
Adverbs are words that modify virtually all part of speech. By extension, adverbs modify verb, adjective, another adverb in a sentence, preposition, nouns or its equivalent, phrase, sentence, paragraph or a whole passage.
<h3>Types of Adverbs</h3>
- Adverb of manner
- Adverb of mannerDegree
- Adverb of mannerDegreeTime
- Adverb of mannerDegreeTimePlace
- Adverb of mannerDegreeTimePlaceConcession
- Adverb of mannerDegreeTimePlaceConcessionReason
- Adverb of mannerDegreeTimePlaceConcessionReasonCondition etc
In conclusion, the answer is <u>quite</u> and its kind is <u>degree</u>.
Learn more on adverbs from here:brainly.com/question/17033724
If a writer is structuring an argument towards an audience that has an interest in a specific cause, the writer will use specific vocabulary, details, stories, and facts that appeal to that cause. Pathos (the use of emotional appeal in an argument) is a strong benefit to add to an argument, and the writer might take a specific story of someone who has been affected by the cause in order to make the audience emotional. If they become emotionally invested in the argument it is more likely to be effective. Additionally, specific vocabulary (including abbreviations) and relevant facts (logos) will help the audience understand and appreciate the argument. Finally, the author should establish their credibility (ethos) as an expert on the subject so that the audience trusts what they are saying.
That which an argumentative text contains that an informative text does not contain is: Opinions.
An argumentative text is a text that is aimed at convincing the audience to take the author's side of an argument. An argumentative text contains the personal opinions of the author and facts that are backed by evidence.
This is not the case with informative texts. Informative texts are mostly unbiased and simply provide the facts that occurred in the past.
So, informative texts do not contain opinions.
Learn more about informative texts here:
brainly.com/question/10022815
