Answer:
The correct answer is D. Those in police custody had certain rights
Explanation:
In Miranda vs Arizona, the supreme court specifically stated that if a person in custody is interrogated by the police, and does not consult with his or her lawyer about what to say druing the interrogation, then, nothing of what he or she says can be used by the prosecutor during trial.
For example, if John Smith is taken into custody, and does not have the legal knowledge to ask for lawyer to provide him with legal advice before interrogation, nothing of what he says to the police can be used by prosecutor Robert Robertson in order to incriminate him during trial.
Answer:
rite of passage, ceremonial event, existing in all historically known societies, that marks the passage from one social or religious status to another. This article describes these rites among various societies throughout the world, giving greatest attention to the most common types of rites; explains their purposes from the viewpoints of the people observing the rites; and discusses their social, cultural, and psychological significance as seen by scholars seeking to gain an understanding of human behavior.
Explanation:
12 months ! I hoped I helped you out !
Depends on the incident.
You can apply it to people doing nothing in a serious situation, and I highly doubt people would come forward if this effect were enacted. The way it works is we become so desensitized to such actions we don't feel it is important to do anything about it or report it.
