Answer:
A. Inhuman, Cruelty, Rebelled
and
for the second one: A.
Explanation:
Explanation:
If Love Were Oil, I'd Be About a Quart Low
Answer:
Nietzsche’s philosophical thoughts on morality argue that a moral code is not in our nature, while
Zimbardo’s argument is that we shouldn’t expect our decisions to be
influenced by morality alone. Nietzsche’s thoughts on morality are
grounded in opposition to Christianity. He begins his argument by
quoting from the Bible, “If thy eye offend thee, pluck it out,” before
labeling the Christian idea as “stupidity” (Paragraph 1). Nietzsche argues
that sensuality is in opposition to Christianity and that the church
“always wanted the destruction of its enemies; we, we immoralists and
Antichristians” (Paragraph 5), adding that “Life has come to an end
where the ‘kingdom of God’ begins” (Paragraph 8). In contrast, Zimbardo
bases his argument on science and proposes that the electric shock
experiment by psychologist Stanley Milgram “provides several lessons
about how situations can foster evil” (Paragraph 5). He also uses
conclusions from a 1974 experiment by Harvard anthropologist John
Watson, as well as his own simulated jail experiment, the 1971 Stanford
Prison Experiment, to help support his argument.
Answer:
Explanation:
Tolerant is a good word to know the meaning of. One of the highest complements you can receive is to be told that you are tolerant.
It means that you are accepting of other cultures. It does not mean indifferent. Indifferent has the additional meaning of not caring about other cultures which would make the population asleep or closed in.
It does not mean unaware. That would make the native population uncaring about what's around them. They certainly don't have to be that way.
Forgiving is too strong a word. It means that there was conflict and the native populations have forgiven the populations for some transgression.
