The correct answer would be, Questions that develop information about the subject's feelings or thoughts.
Investigator can ask the above mentioned question along with other two questions after initial open questions from the subject.
Explanation:
When a research is conducted, there must be a subject from whom the researcher would investigate. Initially the subject is asked or given questions, which he has to answer. After that the researcher can continue the next session of questions. Those questions can be divided into three categories:
- Questions to elicit more information
- Questions to seek an explanation
- Questions that develop information about the subject's feelings or thoughts
These three important clarification questions are asked in the second step of the investigation.
Learn more about What is Research at:
brainly.com/question/968894
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer: A nomothetic method
Explanation:A nomothetic method, refers to a conclusional statement that is taken from studying a pattern of a society at large , which may be just a single event , individual behaviours and experience.
Sociologist uses this method when they are dealing with large data from survey in order to make a quantitative statistical analysis.
"Nature of the national government requires strict system of organization" is not an assumption behind the U.S. Constitution.
Basically, the Articles of Confederation was abandoned because of the weakness perceived in the document.
Some of the weakness of the Articles of Confederation includes:
- Each states have only one congress despite large population of citizen
- No power confer on Congress to regulate foreign trade
- No court or judicial system
- No power conferred on Congress to receive tax
Hence, the statement that "nature of the national government requires strict system of organization" is not an assumption behind the U.S. Constitution.
Therefore, the Option A is correct.
Read more about Articles of Confederation
<em>brainly.com/question/24912988</em>
The type of fallacy that is being described in the scenario
above is the casual fallacy. A casual fallacy is having to use or conclude
ideas in which cause a certain scenario or experience in which is not even
correctly identified.