Based on the fact that Ravi has to brush a certain amount of times, he most likely suffers from obsessive-compulsive disorder.
<h3>What does obsessive-compulsive disorder lead to?</h3>
When a person has OCD, they will engage in repetitive actions because they believe that not doing so can lead to further problems.
Ravi therefore engages in the repetitive action of brushing a certain number of times, because if he doesn't do so, something bad might happen.
Find out more on obsessive-compulsive disorder at brainly.com/question/7578271.
#SPJ
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
Answer:
Definitely A.
A geographer usual interests are toward how something effects a place in world. It can be also define by analysis of the use of scales in a map, such as regional.
This argument is based on "the linguistic relativity hypothesis".
The hypothesis of linguistic relativity holds that the structure of a dialect influences its speakers' reality view or discernment. Prevalently known as the Sapir– Whorf theory, or Whorfianism, the standard is regularly characterized to incorporate two forms. The solid form says that dialect decides thought and that etymological classifications confine and decide intellectual classifications, while the feeble adaptation says that phonetic classifications and use just impact thought and choices.
The item that does not appear on schedule k of form 1120s is Tax-exempt interest income.
<h3>What is contained in Schedule K-3 (Form 1120-S)?</h3>
The schedule contains the Shareholder's Share of Income, Deductions, Credits, etc.
However, when computing tax return, the item that does not appear on schedule k of form 1120s is Tax-exempt interest income.
Read more about Taxation
brainly.com/question/26479536
#SPJ1
