People believe that conventions created specifically for the ratification of amendments form better representations of the people's will. State legislatures can oftentimes be biased for or against a certain amendment for their own wellbeing rather than that of the people they represent.
One major historical example of this can be seen in the use of ratification committees for the ratification of the American Constitution; the Founding Fathers believed that certain state legislatures would not ratify the Constitution even if the citizens of the states wanted to, so special conventions were created to more accurately portray the will of the people.
They saw plessy v Ferguson as that the were "separate but equal" meaning that all races were given the same opportunities but were segregated.
Let me know if this is right/ helps!
Answer:
Dust bowl
Explanation:
When farmers where looking for new land to start up crops because of a drought
Answer:The most common defense of monarchical absolutism, known as “the divine right of kings” theory, asserted that kings derived their authority from God. This view could justify even tyrannical rule as divinely ordained punishment, administered by rulers, for human sinfulness.
Explanation: sorry if I’m wrong this is all I know for that category
