1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Genrish500 [490]
3 years ago
14

Compare both the positive and negative effects of the decision to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. How did this even

t change the relationship between science and government, and relations among countries that possess nuclear weapons?
History
1 answer:
forsale [732]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

End of war and death of people.

Explanation:

The positive effect of dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki is the end of world war II but the negative effect to this dropping is the death of 1,40,000 people. It also has a adverse effect on the environment due to the emission of radiations. This event greatly change the relationship between science and government because the government has gain power due to science and this technology over other countries. There are good relations among countries that possess nuclear weapons because they knew that nucleus will destroy them both so they formed good relations with each other.

You might be interested in
Select the correct locations on the map.
Assoli18 [71]

Answer:

3 2 4 i think

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the US government use propaganda in World War II? Check all that apply. to influence American opinion to stop people fro
marin [14]

Answer:

To influence American opinion, To urge people to join the military, and To encourage civilian contributions

Explanation: They used it to influence what Americans believed. They used it to try and get people to join the military. They used it to get civilians to do things that would contribute to the war.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are some of the reasons people relocate to the U.S. from other countries? What do they gain by making this choice? What are
slavikrds [6]

Answer:

While there are a thousand different reasons why people migrate to the U.S, there are some major ones that we can cover.

  • <u><em>War.</em></u> War is a major one that sometimes <em>forces</em> people to move to the U.S and other countries, being a haven that will protect them from all the dangers.
  • <u><em>College.</em></u> Pretty straightforward, people come to better and further their education.
  • <u><em>Jobs. </em></u> Also pretty straightforward, people come to work here, to live here, the job opportunities are close to endless.
  • <u><em>Family and friends.</em></u> Having family members or close friends in the U.S often is a factor for people moving to the U.S.

They often gain more freedoms* than they have had in their previous country, a democratic country with personal choices like I mentioned earlier,  more job opportunities*, and some of the world's most elite colleges are here. Some of the downsides of moving away from their birthplace and moving to the U.S is that there is a very real possibility of moving away from family and friends, and essentially starting life over again.

4 0
3 years ago
Why would someone want to leave their friends, family, and familiar neighborhood to move to a new country? What incentives draw
Arada [10]

Answer:

They would want to move to a new country because of the enviorment, or because they need to be closer to something. There are many other reaosns.

6 0
2 years ago
Which of the following is an example of a nation using a policy, or practice, of appeasement?
Amiraneli [1.4K]

An example of a nation using a policy, or practice of appeasement is <u>с. Nation A invaded Nation B, and Nations C and D ask Nation A</u> if it is satisfied with what it has gained.

<h3>What is a policy of appeasement?</h3>

The policy of appeasement is a foreign policy whereby an aggrieved country is pacified through negotiations because other nations want to prevent war with the aggressor.

A good example was Britain's policy toward Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany in the 1930s.  This policy encouraged Nazi Germany to become more aggressive in launching the Second World War.

Thus, an example of a nation using a policy, or practice of appeasement is <u>Option C</u>.

Learn more about the policy of appeasement athttps://brainly.com/question/252830

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What legal document explains the legal reasoning behind a Supreme Court decision?
    7·1 answer
  • Why did france sell the louisana territory
    11·2 answers
  • What ideological, military, and economic concerns shaped us involvement in the middle east
    13·1 answer
  • The idea that government is not above the law is an example of the principle of
    8·1 answer
  • How does price serve as an incentive in a market economy?
    8·2 answers
  • Who did the Nazi party choose to blame for the problems of
    8·2 answers
  • Do you think that U.S. imperialism was more beneficial or harmful to Latin American people? Explain.
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an artifact?
    14·2 answers
  • Shotoku’s legacy is _______ .
    12·2 answers
  • In 1943, Jews led an uprising in a ghetto in( blank )
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!