I would have spoke out to the press and public about this injustice and try and get the support of the people
The third alternative is the template (C).
Canada is an industrialized, rich country with a growing population. The country is US neighbor, which makes him to be a consumer of American programming. This is not interpreted as a bad one, however, the government acts to stimulate Canadian programming and culture. This is a form of public policy, investing in an industry that finds economic difficulties and expansion to revive it.
OPTION 3: In 1856, John C. Frémont won eleven northern states on an anti-slavery p.
The Republican party that had originated from a firm political stance against slavery in 1854, nominated John C. Frémont for the 1856 presidential elections.
Even though Frémont didn't gain the elections, he won votes of 11 of the 16 Northern states, unifying the electorate of the Northern and Western states against the Southern states (states in favor of slavery) for the first time in American history.
<span>It is very simple why western nations might be interested in investing in Russia. First of all, the population is almost 145 million. This represents many customers who get to buy your products somewhere else than in your country. Second of all, those customers haven't been exposed to as many diversity in products. There isn't competition like in westernized countries where a new company pops up regularly. This means that companies who open there have a free market where there isn't too much competition. This means a lot to companies because competition is ferocious in western nations.</span>
It would be John Locke, because the founding fathers believed in preserving the natural rights of man.
