Question options:
low viability.
high viability.
deep-level diversity.
individualistic roles.
surface-level diversity
Answer:
high viability
Explanation:
Team viability can be defined as the capacity for a team to function effectively and be as compatible so that there is sustainability and growth required for for their success and performance. This is seen in the above example where Sam and Ernie and Larry work well together and also enjoy each others company so that they are able to function effectively as a team. Therefore Sam, Ernie and Larry can be said to have high viability
The Soviet Union and the US competed because each side wanted their beliefs in Eastern Europe. The US wanted Democracy and free elections in Eastern Europe. On the other hand, The Soviets wanted the socialism and communism in Eastern Europe. Eastern Europe was mostly soviet puppet state’s.
So no one abuses the power they have
Glass ceiling is the correct answer.
The term was used a lot during the 80s. The glass ceiling effect is an unfortunate and invisible barrier created that prevents minorities (and women) from becoming part of an elite manager network in major corporations. In fact, studies have shown that 97% of the top executives are white and only 7-9% are women.
Conclusions: Students who had a consistent pattern of high lecture attendance had higher exam scores than students who had low to intermediate or no attendance but had access to the same course material online.
<h3>Background:</h3>
Rather of attending lectures, students may now watch online lecture recordings. However, there is little data on the proportion of students who attend lectures, attendance patterns, or eventual learning results. Attendance data was utilized to compare learning results of children with varying attendance patterns to investigate this problem.
<h3>Methods: </h3>
A retrospective observational study was conducted utilizing data from the Medical Pharmacology course in Fall 2013 (197 students) and Fall 2014. (207 students). Each semester, attendance was tracked at 13 of 40 lectures using an audience response system. Using lecture capture, all lectures were recorded, and students may attend lectures or examine online recordings and PowerPoint slides as wanted. Exam averages of students in various attendance groups were compared, as well as the frequency distribution of exam scores in various attendance categories.
<h3>Results: </h3>
During the study period, 12-14% of students had a steady pattern of high attendance at monitored lectures, 35-46% had an inconsistent pattern of low to moderate attendance, and 41-52% did not attend any monitored lectures.
Learn more about attendance truly important:
brainly.com/question/8406895
#SPJ4
