In a mixed-motive case, the defendant acknowledges that some discriminatory motive existed but argues that the same hiring decision would have been reached even without the discriminatory motive
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is
a mixed-motive case?</h3>
Generally, A case of employment discrimination in which there is proof that the respondent employer has valid grounds in addition to discriminatory reasons for adopting a specific negative employment action
In conclusion, In a case with mixed motives, the defendant admits that there was at least some discriminatory intent, but contends that the same employment choice would have been made even if there hadn't been any discriminatory intent.
Read more about the mixed-motive case
brainly.com/question/13122333
#SPJ1
The answer is: <span>the scientific achievements in these regions
According to Weber, capitalism flourished in these regions due to many inventions in industrial machineries that centered in these regions.
These inventions make our producer able to create higher quality products with a significantly shorter period of time. </span>
Answer:
Both nepal and swizerland are mountainous and landlocked countries. Swizerland is highly developed and rich, but Nepal is not so developed because people are more educated in Swizerland then of Nepal. In Nepal, many people works after passing school but in Swizerland you must have to learn 12 years in universities to get a job. In Swizerland there is a provision of less import and more export but in Nepal more goods are import from other countries. Transportation facility is good in Swizerland then of Nepal. Swizerland is utilizing natural resources available but Nepal is not utilizing national resources available. Political stabilty can be seen in swizerland but in nepal polical instability can be seen.
