All categories

3 years ago

Which of the following is NOT an informal resolution during the intake process?

Law

2 answers:

seropon [69]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Court hearings

Explanation:

An informal resolution is a process in which both parties agree to resolve a complaint without a hearing or an investigation.

All of these options provide examples of a solution to a problem that don't require an investigation or a hearing, except for court hearings.

KiRa [710]3 years ago

7 0

It’s the last answer ( court hearings)

You might be interested in

8. Why do all drug cases have to have the drugs analyzed before court?

dusya [7]

Answer: They do it because it might look like cocaine or LSD but that doesn't mean it actually is

Explanation:The prosecution must prove that a seized substance is indeed the illicit drug it claims it is by sending the evidence to a crime lab for analysis. The crime lab analyst then must testify at trial in order for the prosecution to make its case.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

An example of japanese imperial rule that was evident when it placed restrictions on korean rights was that

cestrela7 [59]

Answer: The Japanese Imperial rule took control of newspapers and human's right to free speech.

Explanation:

An example of Japanese imperial rule that was evident when it placed restricitons on Korean rights was that it assumed control of the newspapers in the country and disallowed the basic human right to free speech.

Additionally, it also forcefully suppressed the Korean nationalist groups.

5 0

3 years ago

Do you think all criminal cases should be heard by professionals and paid judges instead? Would this be better? Why?

KIM [24]

$\large{\underline{\underline{\pmb{\sf{\color{yellow}{Answer:}}}}}}$

No criminal crime should not be heard judges other than professional and paid judges because they have a lot of experience about these kinds of cases

5 0

3 years ago

Patrick borrowed his friend John’s car to impress a young lady he was dating. It was a new luxury car that John had saved four y

larisa [96]

Answer:

Yes and no.

Patrick would be liable for negligence in allowing the hail damage, as he failed to fulfill his duty of taking reasonable care of the vehicle.

However, he would not be responsible for the hot oil and gravel nicks.

8 0

3 years ago

Select the correct answer.

spayn [35]

Answer:

c. mediation

3 0

3 years ago