The Roe v. Wade case
is not one that the Warren Court established.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Roe v. Wade, a court case of the US Supreme Court was a landmark decision that protected the pregnant woman's liberty to have a choice to have an abortion without government restriction. The Ruling court for Roe v. Wade case is the Supreme Court of the United States.
The term Warren Court applies to the highest court of the United States under Chief judge Earl Warren, which was held from 5 October 1953 to 23 June 1969, and is arguably one of the two significant times of American constitutional law history.
Warren, as Chief Judge, used his political power to direct the Court into decisions that are often contentious and which dramatically increase civil rights and freedoms and the judicial branch.
Warren Court essentially ended racial discrimination in U.S. government schools, expanded plaintiffs ' constitutional rights, guaranteed equal opportunity in state parliamentarians, banned public school state priests, and paving the way for abortive legalization.
Answer:
U bot
Explanation:
u suck at fortnite if u dont friend me and lets one v one
Benol9
Rubber Bullets. They do penetrate paper, but not skin. They leave bruises which last for about 2-3 weeks at the most.
Hope this helps you! If available please give me a Branliest. It is much appreciated! It would also help me answer more questions!
Goodluck
- Mathhotdog •~•
Answer: in our country, any proposal to amend the Constitution is idle because it’s effectively impossible….The Founders made the amendment process difficult because they wanted to lock in the political deals that made ratification of the Constitution possible. Moreover, they recognized that, for a government to function well, the ground rules should be stable. But they also understood that the people will need to change those ground rules as new challenges and problems surface with the passage of time….But the Founders blundered. They made passing an amendment too hard….In setting the bar so high, the Framers didn’t foresee that as the country became more populous and diverse, it would become harder for people to reach the near-consensus required for change.”
