Answer:
Conflicts
Explanation:
Conflicts in psychology are a term that describes two or more than two motives that are responsible for the conflicts between the approaches. All conflicts are not so severe as it appears. There are some positive aspects of conflicts.
- Approach-Approach conflicts
- Approach-Avoidance conflicts
- Avoidance-Avoidance conflicts
- Avoidance-Approach conflicts
The concept of linked lives involves the notion that development as an individual is intertwined with that of other family members.
Development is defined as the process of growth or new information or events. An example of evolution is the change from caterpillars to butterflies. An example of development is the emerging details of a local robbery. An example of a development is a residential community for the elderly. noun.
In addition to creating better jobs, development is important to the country because it improves the economy and trade. As the country develops, more and more international companies are settling in and trading with other countries. This will further improve the country's economy and further increase the supply of good jobs.
Learn more about development here:brainly.com/question/11352260
#SPJ4
Answer:
Explanation:
Basically the founding fathers (who were all trash btw) are saying "Hey the king was being hella annoying by taxing us too much, killing some of us for protesting,etc. and all of his actions have shown that it's necessary for us to become our own country. Let's also not forget the fact that thousands of miles of sea separate us from these mfs so now we have more of a reason to separate from them. For reasons caused by the King (the taxing and unjust rule/killings) and by God (laws of nature aka the ocean) give us enough reason to announce that we are officially separating from these h-oes and becoming our own country" yeah that's basically what they meant lol hope this helped
The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:
Which of the following is not a permissible circumstance under which to implement a prior restraint, under Near v. Minnesota?
a. obscene publications.
b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
c. Obstruction of military recruitment.
d. Publication of troop movement in the time of war.
Answer:
The answer is b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
Explanation:
Although it is possible for certain words to cause immense violence when used in publications, under Near v. Minnesota (a United States Supreme Court decision which declared that prior restraints on publication violated the freedom of speech and press) it is still not permissible to implement a prior restraint, even when publications use fighting words that are likely to promote immense violence.
