Answer:
(3,4)
Step-by-step explanation:
The amount of steps applied from the reflection line to the point would be also applied inversely to the image point (after reflection).
From y=x to (4,3), it goes 1 down and also goes 1 right. (NOTE: It does not go down and right. Instead, it goes <em>either</em> down and right)
So now inverse that to make 1 up and also going 1 left.
Answer:
1,338,750$
Step-by-step explanation:
1990 price was 850,000
in 2000
850,000 + 125% = 1,062,500
850,000 + 1,062,500 = 1,912,500
in 2013
1,912,500 - 30% = 573,750
1,912,500 - 573,750 = 1,338,750
Answer:
its 500$ to buy 1000 mac and cheese at 50 cent a piece so im asuming the answer is A
Step-by-step explanation:
No, you can't. If the denominator is greater than the numerator, that fraction's absolute value is always less than 1. If the numerator is greater than the denominator, that fraction's absolute value is always more than 1. Therefore, for both of them to be equal to each other, you are saying that a fraction that is less than 1 is equal to the fraction more than one. However, you can have a fraction with a larger denominator actually be of greater value than the one with the larger numerator. For example, -(9/8) vs -(8/9). -(9/8) has a greater numerator, yet -(8/9) is greater than it, despite having a larger denominator. Of course, this case can be written off as having the negative factored in with either the numerator with denominator, so it is easier to remember the rule above without the negative mumbo jumbo.
