Answer:
Yes, earning sensitivity will change in the long run
Explanation:
Earnings Sensitivity Analysis helps in determining the impact of an independent variable over a particular dependent variable based on various assumptions. This comparison on its own, measures changes in the long run.
This technique helps managers in determining the change in net interest income in correspondence to wide range of interest rates.
The repricing gap in the long term window will measure of the difference between the dollar value of assets that will reprice and the dollar value of liabilities that will reprice within a specific time period.
A possible implication is potential to receive a new interest rate.
The assets that could explain the positive reprising gap is Accounts payable and investments.
Two examples of Liabilities are: Short term loans and accounts payable.
Answer:Motor vehicles, up to a certain value.
Reasonably necessary clothing.
Reasonably necessary household goods and furnishings.
Household appliances.
Jewelry, up to a certain value.
Pensions.
A portion of equity in the debtor's home.
Explanation:
Answer:
contact the lender's representative immediately before signing the documents.
Explanation:
The above is an example of Actual or Potential misrepresentation which falls under Code of Conduct 5.10. Once a notary signing agent notices that during the signing appointment, the information provided by the borrower differs from what is on the loan document, he should immediately report such false misrepresentation (potential or actual misrepresentation or falsehood known) witnessed by the NSA in connection with a transaction to the representative of the NSA.
By contacting the lender's representative, the purpose for obtaining the loan will be confirmed whether the property being financed is an investment property or for a primary residency otherwise the notary signing agent will be held responsible for any infraction if his signature is appended because he is expected to verify the authenticity of the information provided.
Because the % discounts cannot be added to calculate the final price.
The first discount is over the original price but the second discount is over the already discounted price.
You can find a combined factor if you multiply the two factors.
Discount of 25% => Factor = 0.75
Now you can find the combined factor by multilplying 0.75*.75 = 0.5625
That means that the final price will be the original price times 0.5625 (or what is the same that the discount is 100 - 56.25 = 43.75%.
Then the operation results in a higher price than if you multiply by 0.5 (50% discount).
In conclusion the discount resulting from two consecutive 25% discounts is less than a 50% discount.
Answer:
b. competitive advantage.
Explanation:
Competitive advantage -
It is the condition which allows the company or the country to produce services or goods of lower price but of equal level .
It enables the productivity to generate superior margins or more sales in comparison to its own market rivals .
These are attributed to factors like the cost , branding , the distribution network , customer service , intellectual property and structure .
Hence , from the data of the question , the correct option is ( b ) .
