The Great Dictator was a comedic parody of antisemitism in Nazi Germany.
For his own sake, no. What he did blatantly put himself in danger and finally was placed under interrogation, etc & so forth.
For the sake of science, yes. What he did, and the consequences thereof, would have publicised his struggle, especially during the age of Enlightenment. Although what he did might also have momentarily pushed people away from science in fear of the consequences of facing the church due to the harsh punishment that he was subjected to. His persistence was, in the end only healthy for the development of science in later years.
Economic activities nations also have similar
We still think that direct exposure to filth/decay can give us diseases and it’s probably true.
Answer:
sample space may be
Explanation:
n=9 according to probability
