<span> Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton </span>
Chief Justice John Marshall stated last 1803 in the case of Marbury v. Madison that "It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases, must of necessity expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each."
It implies that the judicial department applies the law and the understanding and interpretation therein would still be based on the designated person. If soever, the interpreter or representative in the judicial department would make any conflict with the intent, process, actual application of the law (the two representation of law), the courts would be the end to finalize the decision.
Answer: A male Roman citizen enjoyed a wide range of privileges and protections defined in detail by the Roman state. A citizen could, under certain exceptional circumstances, be deprived of his citizenship. Roman women had a limited form of citizenship. They were not allowed to vote or stand for civil or public office.
Explanation: i hope this helped :)
They were constantly experiencing racism, discrimination, and segregation. As well as being forced into marches , riots , or parades just to actually be heard in the white society.
Explanation:
i believe this statement means that wonder who made the history when we were the ones who made it. I agree bc it tells you to reflect upon the past
