Answer:
Generally, white power structures responded to the Civil Rights Movement based on their geographic location. Thus, most southerners spoke out against this movement, while most northerners supported the cause. This situation was even transversal to the Democratic and Republican parties, since for example Lyndon Johnson, Democratic President who approved the Civil Rights Act in 1964, supported the movement while Orval Faubus, Governor of Arkansas for the same party, did not do so in absolute.
In general, the governors and mayors of the south of the country did everything possible to prevent the advancement and achievements of this movement, through imprisonment (such as in Birmingham, where Martin Luther King was imprisoned), police repression and various government restrictions.
In contrast, northern politicians and those in Washington generally had a more open and responsive stance, supporting the movement and believing in equal opportunities.
Answer:
a bueno para saber bro ...
Answer:
The answers are options A and D
Explanation:
Umayyad line, likewise spelled Omayyad, the principal extraordinary Muslim administration to control the realm of the caliphate (661– 750 ce), in some cases alluded to as the Arab kingdom reflecting conventional Muslim objection to the common idea of the Umayyad state.The Umayyads were the primary Muslim line that is, they were the main leaders of the Islamic Empire to go down power inside their family. Under their standard, which endured from 661 to 750 AD, the early Islamic people group was changed into the most great realm of the day.Although this line bound to defeat after a centaury however the elements behind its ruin was available at the season of its start and governmental issues of the adjust caliphs and their debasement expanded it.The family settled dynastic, innate principle with Muawiya ibn Abi Sufyan, long-lasting legislative leader of Syria, who turned into the fifth Caliph after the finish of the First Muslim Civil War in 661.
Journal Information
Established in 1893 and published continuously since then, the Virginia Magazine of History and Biography is the quarterly journal of the Virginia Historical Society, a privately supported and endowed educational institution headquartered in Richmond, Virginia. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and edited primary documents on all aspects and time periods of Virginia history and related topics. The VMHB serves as the journal of record for reviews of books on Virginia history and publishes the annual report of the VHS.
Publisher Information
The VMHB is published by the Virginia Historical Society, a privately supported and endowed educational institution founded in 1831 and headquartered in Richmond, Virginia. The mission of the VHS is to collect, preserve, and interpret the commonwealth's past for the education and enjoyment of present and future generations. With education as its primary focus, it offers public lectures, seminars, conferences, and consulting services; publishes teacher resource materials; conducts teacher training and recertification workshops both on- and off-site; arranges school and general group tours and activities; supports scholarly research through an endowed fellowship program and minority internships; maintains a museum of changing, permanent, and traveling exhibitions; operates a research library and a publications program that has functioned uninterrupted for more than 100 years.
