1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ulleksa [173]
2 years ago
5

The group of test subject that are NOT given the experimental treatment Il what?

Law
1 answer:
Vikki [24]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Treatment and control groups. In experimental research, some subjects are administered one or more experimental stimulus called a treatment the treatment group  while other subjects are not given such a stimulus the control group

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What in jrotc does Integrity mean?
Evgesh-ka [11]

Answer:

To do whats right, legally and morally.

Explanation:

Mark bRainliest

8 0
3 years ago
Another round of bullets hits my skin
Misha Larkins [42]

Answer:

I won't let them break me down to dust I know that there's a place for us

Explanation:

For we are glorious

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
For an offender which option is an example of a formal sanction? A prison sentence declared by law authorities, suspicion coming
Dovator [93]

Answer:  A prison sentence

Explanation: a formal sanction is any sanction by law and is enforced by an authoritative source.

The others would all be informal sanctions

3 0
2 years ago
How does the Fourth Amendment protect individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures by the police? When are there exceptio
sammy [17]

INTERESTS PROTECTED

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides that "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." The ultimate goal of this provision is to protect people’s right to privacy and freedom from unreasonable intrusions by the government. However, the Fourth Amendment does not guarantee protection from all searches and seizures, but only those done by the government and deemed unreasonable under the law. To claim violation of Fourth Amendment as the basis for suppressing a relevant evidence, the court had long required that the claimant must prove that he himself was the victim of an invasion of privacy to have a valid standing to claim protection under the Fourth Amendment. However, the Supreme Court has departed from such requirement, issue of exclusion is to be determined solely upon a resolution of the substantive question whether the claimant's Fourth Amendment rights have been violated, which in turn requires that the claimant demonstrates a justifiable expectation of privacy, which was arbitrarily violated by the government. In general, most warrantless searches of private premises are prohibited under the Fourth Amendment, unless specific exception applies. For instance, a warrantless search may be lawful, if an officer has asked and is given consent to search; if the search is incident to a lawful arrest; if there is probable cause to search and there is exigent circumstance calling for the warrantless search. Exigent circumstances exist in situations where a situation where people are in imminent danger, where evidence faces imminent destruction, or prior to a suspect's imminent escape. On the other hand, warrantless search and seizure of properties are not illegal, if the objects being searched are in plain view. Further, warrantless seizure of abandoned property, or of properties on an open field do not violate Fourth Amendment, because it is considered that having expectation of privacy right to an abandoned property or to properties on an open field is not reasonable. However, in some states, there are some exception to this limitation, where some state authorities have granted protection to open fields. States can always establish higher standards for searches and seizures protection than what is required by the Fourth Amendment, but states cannot allow conducts that violate the Fourth Amendment. Where there was a violation of one’s fourth amendment rights by federal officials, A bivens action can be filed against federal law enforcement officials for damages, resulting from an unlawful search and seizure. Under the Bivens action, the claimant needs to prove that there has been a constitutional violation of the fourth amendment rights by federal officials acting under the color of law. However, the protection under the Fourth Amendment can be waived if one voluntarily consents to or does not object to evidence collected during a warrantless search or seizure.

8 0
3 years ago
Please help ASAP !
Anna [14]

Answer:

limited government I think

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Dollar general primary concern about robberies is
    12·1 answer
  • The first city to establish a formal law enforcement force was _____.
    15·2 answers
  • In 100 or more words, tell of the Supreme Court's responsibility in interpreting the Constitution -- in other words, why does th
    5·1 answer
  • Resting your arm on the open window
    10·2 answers
  • How do you regard a flashing red light?
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements best describes the role that ethics play in a criminal justice professional's discretionary de
    10·1 answer
  • How did the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act fit the example of elastic clause
    12·1 answer
  • as I read the new farm laws I don't found anything against the farmers so why are they protesting. please be neutral. this quest
    10·1 answer
  • A veteran wants to buy a home for which the owners will accept no less than $120,000. The Certificate of Reasonable Value indica
    15·1 answer
  • Pháp luật đại cương là gì
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!