The case filed by Gerwin against Baker will be null and void, as thee is no existence of any legal contract between the parties as such.
<h3>What is a legal contract?</h3>
A contract is said to be a legal one when the party who is presented with such an offer accepts on the terms and with a condition that the offer must be for legal activities.
In case when any of the criterion mentioned above are not followed by the offeror or the offeree, then in such case, any lawsuit filed against the plaintiff will be considered as null and void.
Hence, it can be concluded that there is no legal contract between Gerwin and Baker, and thus their cases are null and void.
Learn more about a legal contract here:
brainly.com/question/3208041
#SPJ1
Answer: Controlling
Explanation:
Controlling is a management process which involves comparing the outcome of an organization's processes to the targets set for those processes beforehand, and taking corrective measures in case the outcome is deviating from the set targets. For example, a manager of a business running at a loss, can identify the cause of the loss and find ways of correcting the negative outcome.
Answer:
The answer is: No, he can't discriminate.
Explanation:
The Civil Rights Act of 1866 defined citizenship without distinction of race or color, and stated that all citizens are equally protected by the law.
So the owner of the house (as well as everyone else in this country) is prohibited by law to discriminate potential buyers on the basis of race.