Ideas on the appropriate limits of the monarch's power changed in the 17th century to a small extent.
<h3>What were ideas of a monarch's power in the 17th century?</h3>
In the 17th century, Europe had very powerful monarchs who basically ruled by decree. They limits to their power was debated but not much was done to limit it.
This wasn't the case in England however because the powers of a monarch was limited thanks to a Civil War and then the Glorious Revolution. The limits can therefore be said to have changed to a small extent.
Find out more on the power of monarchs at brainly.com/question/142097
#SPJ1
Answer:
The Warren Court reached a 6-2 verdict in favor of Baker. A lack of political question, previous court intervention in apportionment affairs and equal protection under the 14th amendment gave the court enough reason to rule on legislative apportionment. Court gained power to rule on apportionment laws.
Explanation:
Answer:
The settlement of the Americas began when Paleolithic hunter-gatherers entered North America from the North Asian Mammoth steppe via the Beringia land bridge, which had formed between northeastern Siberia and western Alaska due to the lowering of sea level during the Last Glacial Maximum.
<h2>:) "happy to help" (: </h2>
Answer:
The Aztecs were extremely warlike, their entire empire centered around war, and they were settled in a swampy island in Lake Texcoco, in what is today central Mexico. They also built temples.
The Incas had a centralized government and their civilization was centered around religion, so they built many temples. The Incas were also chose diplomacy before war, but if the people they were bargaining with refused the offer, they would use force to get what they wanted.
I'm not really sure what they mean by North American and South America, but I hope the information I gave above helps at least a little. If it does, could you mark it brainliest? :)
I am sorry I don't know I really need the points I hope you understand
