Answer:
Let’s analyze this conflict from the perspective of a conservation biologist.
Explanation:
<u>Conservation biologist</u> knows the<em> value of all species naturally present in a given ecosystem and the need to maintain balance in numbers of each species. Thus, uncontrolled hunting of wild carnivores may lead to reduction in their number and ultimately endanger the given species of carnivores in a particular country</em>.
Meanwhile, conservation biologist understands that certain people perceive <em>commons</em>, as a shared resource system, in a different way. In particular, people with particular interest and needs (<u>farmers and ranchers</u>), affected by the natural functioning of this system. From their perspective, resources that do not belong to any other particular individual and which are considered to be common, can be neglected if they interfere with farmer business. If the commons are unregulated it can lead to a greater abuse, thus the 'tragedy of commons'.
Oligarchy
I think because they are a small group that rules a country
Answer:
Generally, conflicts arise from mismatches between power, organizational demands and feelings of personal worth..
<em>Human relations view of conflict means to accept that conflict is a important aspect of any organization. Rather than seeing it as a negative or a necessity it needs to be managed. If all of that is right. Then an example would be; If one person agues that Alternating current electricity is better than direct current electricity and the other says the opposite. The outcome now is that it is more beneficial we use both in everyday life. A/C is a safer and simplistic use of electricity for power converters while d/c is needed to supply a constant frequency current to LED lighting. Without both sides advancing we wouldn’t be able to keep progressing. or maybe that is a bad example… Maybe you start a business and you feel quality is a better formula than quantity. But you have such a high demand for your product your cheaper opponents outsell you. So now you decide to make a part of the product with a cheaper material. Thus still being superior product yet the quality has decreased. But now you have achieved a higher goal than you would have otherwise. I think conflict helps a company grow but if it leans too far one way outcome will become someone else’s achievement. If you cut out all conflict you may never be able to adapt to succeed.</em><em>.</em><em> </em>
Answer:
a food shortage could effect the population in many ways; first, when the citizens already living there notice the food shortage, they'll be the first to move away, which is one way the population will decrease. Then, people won't move to an area with a food shortage, which will lead the population to stay at the same rate, and won;t allow the population to grow, and lastly, the economy will suffer if their is a food shortage; especially food markets, and people will become aware that this area is short on food.
Explanation:
