Answer:
Not sure but can narrow it down
Explanation:
I don't have enough info to be sure about the answer. I don't know if there is an article or passage to read. If there is, please upload it so I can help you further. I think the answer should be either the first choice or the last choice. If you want to persuade readers that huskies sometimes steal food from humans, in order to compare the consequences, it could be to open up someone's eyes as to what they are doing is wrong. It would be like asking a thief, how would you feel if a husky snatched your filet mignon off of your plate? They would hopefully see that it wouldn't feel good, therefore they shouldn't steal because it will hurt someone else.
The option that says they want to persuade readers that humans and huskies are treated as equals, in my opinion, means that if we would give consequences to a dog such as scolding him, a human should also receive some sort of consequence.
Answer:
1)You have facilitated communications
2)We have access to tons of information in seconds.
<span>first-person protagonist is the correct awnser</span>
Answer: As for Washington, he grew up on a large plantation but wasn't a proud president. He still made sacrifices for U.S. And as for Lincoln, though he had a relatively 'poor' background, he fought for what was right and won the love of Americans.
Explanation:
In the lines
“In the world’s broad field of battle,
In the bivouac of life,”
the poet suggests about human life with the images in these lines that:
Life is an eternal struggle.
The poem “A Psalm of Life” reflects that the soul cannot be defeated by the passage of time. It highlights the importance of the present. The poem tells about the continuous struggle which a person needs to undergo in a span of life.
