Answer:
there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
A marketing organization claims that more than 10% of its employees are paid minimum wage.
The null hypothesis is:
The alternative hypothesis is:
If a hypothesis test is performed that fails to reject the null hypothesis, how would this decision be interpreted
i.e Decision Rule: fails to reject the null hypothesis
Then the interpretation of the decision is that, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Answer:
1,524 centimeters
Step-by-step explanation:
Multiply 50 by 12. 50 * 12 = 600 inches
Multiply 600 by 2.54 to get the number of centimeters. 600 * 2.54 = 1,524
Answer: 2.2 meters
Step-by-step explanation:
The data is:
The initial piece is 6.35 meters long.
We cut 25 pieces of 16.2cm each, so in pieces only we have:
25*16.2cm = 405cm
1m = 100cm
Then: 405cm = (405/100) m = 4.05m
And each time that we cut a piece, we have 4mm of waste.
Then we have 25 times the 4mm of waste, this means that the total waste is:
4mm*25 = 100mm
and 1000mm = 1m
100mm = (100/1000) m = 0.1m
So the total amount that was cut is:
4.05m + 0.1m = 4.15m
The length in the channel iron will be: 6.35m - 4.15m = 2.2 meters
