Evidence that can be used to modify or refute what Stannard said about Columbus would be (D) examples of long-term benefits for people in Europe and Asia that resulted from the voyages by Columbus.
<h3>What did Stannard think of Columbus?</h3>
David Stannard thinks very lowly of Christopher Columbus as a result of the latter's crimes in North America which included the killing and mutilating of Native Americans.
David Stannard believed that the exploration of the Americas brought only long-term pain to Native Americans so a view that would refute this would have to show descriptions that Native Americans enjoyed some long term benefits thanks to Columbus.
Find out more on Christopher Columbus at brainly.com/question/15581111
#SPJ1
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
According to what I already know about global temperature trends, the trends that I expect to see as I plot how temperatures have changed over time is that it is going to increase probably a little more in the coming years before it starts a period of cooling on the surface of planet earth.
Ye, although it could sound strange at this moment, some Eastern European scientists have announced the coming of a "mini-ice age" in the next 40 or 50 years.
My source of prior knowledge that I consider reliable is the Russian Academy of Sciences. More specifically, the Pulkovo Observatory belongs to the Research Laboratory in St. Petersburg, Russia.
I am referring specifically to the research results published by Dr. Habibullo Abdussamatov, who is the Head of the Space Laboratory for the Russian Agency.
Gutenburg's printing press made books cheaper and available to a larger variety of people. Before the printing press, books were very hard to make and they took a long time to produce.
<span>The Estate General had not been used because of the resentment of the church.
Hope this helps!</span>
<span>The growth and development of the Repulican party, as well as the Election of 1856 had a large impact on the American political system during the above time period, just as the impact of slavery was influential. Slavery and anti-immigrant mentalities actually weakened the main political parties and allowed for the emergence of the Republican party during this time. This party formed in the midwest and in some regions in the north.</span>
