These scientists are called behaviorists, where they examine the actions and drives to which humans respond and act towards a stimuli and from environmental origin.
Learned, this behavior is caused by imitating the behavior of an another individual.
Innate, an approach where behavior is said to have a biological origin and not shaped by the environment such as reflex response.
Thank you for your question. Please don't hesitate to ask in Brainly your queries.
The Arab Maghreb Union or AMU consists of Algeria, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, and Tunisia.
When the countries of Tunisia and Morocco became independent countries, it was also during that moment that the concept of an economic union was first thought of. The chief of state of the 5 members of these countries manages the AMU.
Amae, which translates to "presumed indulgence," is a phrase used in Japanese to express actions and feelings that are associated with behaving spoiltly.
Schadenfreude is a compound word made up of the German nouns Schaden (which means "damage" or "hurt") and Freude (which means "pleasure"). So it seems logical that the term "schadenfreude" refers to the enjoyment of another's hurt or misfortune.
The differences exist between the facial expression of joy and schadenfreude, the pleasurable feeling that results from another's suffering. Videos showing Dutch soccer players' missed penalty shoots and German soccer players' successful penalty shots were shown to cause Schadenfreude and delight, respectively.
To learn more about Schadenfreude, refer
brainly.com/question/2664608
#SPJ4
The direct democracy or pure democracy it´s a form of democracy in which the people directly decides on policy initiatives, it differs from the representative democracy; the one that it´s currently established in the majority of the countries; because in that the people choose the representantives and they are those who decide the policies to carry on. In the representative democracy the people do not govern, it´s a common mistake to mix both concepts.
Two different forms of direct democracy are participatory democracy and deliberative democracy. The deliberative democracy is a form in which the deliberation it´s a central matter to the decisions and it is seen as an amalgalm of the direct and the representative democracies. It holds that for a democratic decision to be legitimate, it must be preceded by an authentic deliberation not a mere voting.
The participatory democracy is one that emphasizes the broad participation of everybody but it demands to the citizens to be more involved in the political participation.
I think that a group taking a vote on something is an example of a participatory democracy because everyone have the same power to create consensus and, at last it would win the iniciative that obtain more votes. If the example was a representative democracy then the group would have to vote for only one person to make a decision and then the group will follow the "leader" choice althought it goes against the majority of what the group wants.
I hope the answer to be useful for you. Regards.
Between the years 1778 and 1783, the nations of France and England disputed a war between each other. Both nations were the greatest powers on Earth during that time, and the conflict was a result of both parties trying to beat the other in relation to the amount of colonies they had, specially in America.
It can be said that the biggest winner of this conflict was neither France or England, but the United States of America. The north-american country benefited from the conflict for many years, simply by serving both sides.
