Answer:
(blue)
slope -( 3)
y-intercept -( -1)
equation - y=3x-1
(yellow)
slope -( 3)
y-intercept -( 0)
equation - y=3x
Step-by-step explanation:
I...your welcome
$3.60 for 2 cups would be $1.80 for one cup.
$3.60 for 2
$5.40 for 3
$7.20 for 4
$9 for 5
$10.80 for 6
$12.60 for 7
$14.40 for 8
A square rotated about its center by 360º maps onto itself at 4 different angles of rotation. You can reflect a square onto itself across 4 different lines of reflection.
We have that
<span>triangle ABC
where
A(-5, 5), B(1, 1), and C(3, 4) are the vertices
using a graph tool
see the attached figure
the hypotenuse is the segment AC
find the equation of the line AC
</span>A(-5, 5) C(3, 4)
<span>
step 1
find the slope m
m=(y2-y1)/(x2-x1)-----> m=</span>(4-5)/(3+5)-----> m=-1/8
step 2
with C(3,4) and m=-1/8
find the equation of a line
y-y1=m*(x-x1)-----> y-4=(-1/8)*(x-3)----> y=(-1/8)*x+(3/8)+4
y=(-1/8)*x+(3/8)+4----> multiply by 8----> 8y=-x+3+32
8y=-x+35
the standard form is Ax+By=C
so
x+8y=35
A=1
B=8
C=35
the answer isx+8y=35
In accordance with <em>propositional</em> logic, <em>quantifier</em> theory and definitions of <em>simple</em> and <em>composite</em> propositions, the negation of a implication has the following equivalence:
(Correct choice: iii)
<h3>How to find the equivalent form of a proposition</h3>
Herein we have a <em>composite</em> proposition, that is, the union of <em>monary</em> and <em>binary</em> operators and <em>simple</em> propositions. According to <em>propositional</em> logic and <em>quantifier</em> theory, the negation of an implication is equivalent to:
To learn more on propositions: brainly.com/question/14789062
#SPJ1